FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005

or

Commission file number 1-13079

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

One Gaylord Drive
Nashville, Tennessee 37214
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

(615) 316-6000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No £

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2005
INDEX

2

Part I — Financial Information

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gaylord Entertainment Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the financial information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim period have been included. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

As more fully discussed in Note 4, the Company changed its method of accounting for its investment in Bass Pro Shops, L.P. (“Bass Pro”) from the cost method of accounting to the equity method of accounting in the third quarter of 2004. The equity method of accounting has been applied retroactively to all periods presented, and the Company has restated the condensed consolidated statement of operations and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This change in accounting principle increased net income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 by $0.5 million. This change in accounting principle had no impact on cash flows provided by operating activities – continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

During 2003 and prior years, the Company classified certain market auction rate debt securities as cash and cash equivalents – unrestricted. During 2004, the Company determined that these securities should be classified as short-term investments due to the fact that the original maturity of these securities is greater than three months. As a result, the Company revised its statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2004 to present the purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities. This reclassification had no impact on net income or cash flows provided by operating activities — continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

2. INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE:

The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is calculated as follows:

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the effect of dilutive stock options was the equivalent of approximately 1,050,000 and 442,000 shares of common stock outstanding, respectively. Because the Company had a loss from continuing operations in the three ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, these incremental shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for those periods as the effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

6

3. COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:

Comprehensive loss is as follows for the three months of the respective periods:

4. INVESTMENTS

From January 1, 2000 to July 8, 2004, the Company accounted for its investment in Bass Pro under the cost method of accounting. On July 8, 2004, Bass Pro redeemed the approximate 28.5% interest held in Bass Pro by private equity investor, J.W. Childs Associates. As a result, the Company’s ownership interest in Bass Pro increased to 26.6% as of the redemption date. Because the Company’s ownership interest in Bass Pro increased to a level exceeding 20%, the Company was required by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, “The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock”, to begin accounting for its investment in Bass Pro under the equity method of accounting beginning in the third quarter of 2004. The equity method of accounting has been applied retroactively to all periods presented.

This change in accounting principle increased net income and net income per share – fully diluted by $0.5 million and $0.01, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

As of March 31, 2005, the recorded value of the Company’s investment in Bass Pro is $62.5 million greater than its equity in Bass Pro’s underlying net assets. This difference is being accounted for as equity method goodwill.

7

5. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

The Company has reflected the following businesses as discontinued operations, consistent with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144 and Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) No. 30: WSM-FM and WWTN(FM); Word Entertainment, the Company’s contemporary Christian music business; the Acuff-Rose Music Publishing entity; GET Management, the Company’s artist management business; the Company’s ownership interest in the Oklahoma RedHawks, a minor league baseball team based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; the Company’s international cable networks; the businesses sold to affiliates of The Oklahoma Publishing Company in 2001 consisting of Pandora Films, Gaylord Films, Gaylord Sports Management, Gaylord Event Television and Gaylord Production Company; and the Company’s water taxis that were sold in 2001. These businesses did not impact the Company’s results of operations during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. However, the carrying value of the remaining assets and liabilities of these businesses have been reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144 for all periods presented.

The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are comprised of:

8

6. ACQUISITION:

     Whistler Lodging Company, Ltd.

On February 1, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Whistler Lodging Company, Ltd. (“Whistler”) from O’Neill Hotels and Resorts Whistler, Ltd. for an aggregate purchase price of $0.1 million in cash plus the assumption of Whistler’s liabilities as of February 1, 2005 of $4.9 million. Whistler manages approximately 600 vacation rental units located in Whistler, British Columbia. The results of operations of Whistler have been included in the Company’s financial results beginning February 1, 2005.

The total cash purchase price of the Whistler acquisition was as follows (amounts in thousands):

The Company has accounted for the Whistler acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to Whistler’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their estimated fair value as of the date of completion of the Whistler acquisition. The Company determined these fair values with the assistance of a third party valuation expert. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill will not be amortized and will be tested for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that the goodwill may be impaired. The final allocation of the purchase price is subject to adjustments for a period not to exceed one year from the consummation date (the allocation period) in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 95-3 “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” The allocation period is intended to differentiate between amounts that are determined as a result of the identification and valuation process required by SFAS No. 141 for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and amounts that are determined because information that was not previously obtainable becomes obtainable. The purchase price allocation as of February 1, 2005 was as follows (in thousands):

Tangible assets acquired totaled $1.8 million, which included $0.7 million of restricted cash, $0.6 million of net trade receivables and $0.2 million of property and equipment.

Approximately $0.2 million was allocated to amortizable intangible assets consisting of existing property management contracts. Property management contracts represent existing contracts with property owners, homeowner associations and other direct ancillary service contracts. Property management contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining useful life of the contracts, which is estimated to be seven years from acquisition.

As of March 31, 2005 and February 1, 2005, goodwill related to the Whistler acquisition totaled $3.0 million. During the two months ended March 31, 2005, the Company made no adjustments to goodwill.

9

     East West Resorts

On January 1, 2005, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding membership interests of East West Resorts at Summit County, LLC, Aspen Lodging Company, LLC, Great Beach Vacations, LLC, East West Realty Aspen, LLC, and Sand Dollar Management Investors, LLC (collectively, “East West Resorts”) from East West Resorts, LLC for an aggregate purchase price of $20.7 million in cash plus the assumption of East West Resort’s liabilities as of January 1, 2005 of $7.8 million. East West Resorts manages approximately 2,000 vacation rental units located in Colorado ski destinations and South Carolina beach destinations. The results of operations of East West Resorts have been included in the Company’s financial results beginning January 1, 2005.

The total cash purchase price of the East West Resorts acquisition was as follows (amounts in thousands):

The Company has accounted for the East West Resorts acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to East West Resorts’ net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their estimated fair value as of the date of completion of the acquisition. The Company determined these fair values with the assistance of a third party valuation expert. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill will not be amortized and will be tested for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that the goodwill may be impaired. The final allocation of the purchase price is subject to adjustments for a period not to exceed one year from the consummation date (the allocation period) in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” and EITF Issue 95-3 “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” The allocation period is intended to differentiate between amounts that are determined as a result of the identification and valuation process required by SFAS No. 141 for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and amounts that are determined because information that was not previously obtainable becomes obtainable. The purchase price allocation as of January 1, 2005 was as follows (in thousands):

Tangible assets acquired totaled $9.7 million, which included $4.0 million of restricted cash, $0.3 million of net trade receivables and $4.2 million of property and equipment.

Approximately $7.0 million was allocated to amortizable intangible assets consisting of existing property management contracts and non-competition agreements. Property management contracts represent existing contracts with property owners, homeowner associations and other direct ancillary service contracts. Property management contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining useful life of the contracts, which is estimated to be seven years from acquisition. Non-competition agreements represent contracts with certain former owners and managers of East West Resorts, LLC that prohibit them from competing with the acquired companies for a period of five years. Non-competition agreements are amortized on a straight line basis over the remaining useful life of the agreements, which is estimated to be five years from acquisition.

10

As of March 31, 2005 and January 1, 2005, goodwill related to the East West Resorts acquisition totaled $12.0 million and $11.9 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company made adjustments to accrued liabilities associated with the East West Resorts acquisition as a result of obtaining additional information. These adjustments resulted in a net increase in goodwill of $0.1 million.

     ResortQuest International, Inc.

On November 20, 2003, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of August 4, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of ResortQuest International, Inc. in a tax-free, stock-for-stock merger. Under the terms of the agreement, ResortQuest stockholders received 0.275 shares of Gaylord common stock for each outstanding share of ResortQuest common stock, and the ResortQuest option holders received 0.275 options to purchase Gaylord common stock for each outstanding option to purchase one share of ResortQuest common stock. Based on the number of shares of ResortQuest common stock outstanding as of November 20, 2003 (19,339,502) and the exchange ratio (0.275 Gaylord common share for each ResortQuest common share), the Company issued 5,318,363 shares of Gaylord common stock. In addition, based on the total number of ResortQuest options outstanding at November 20, 2003, the Company exchanged ResortQuest options for options to purchase 573,863 shares of Gaylord common stock. Based on the average market price of Gaylord common stock ($19.81, which was based on an average of the closing prices for two days before, the day of, and two days after the date of the definitive agreement, August 4, 2003), together with the direct merger costs, this resulted in an aggregate purchase price of approximately $114.7 million plus the assumption of ResortQuest’s outstanding indebtedness as of November 20, 2003, which totaled $85.1 million.

The total purchase price of the ResortQuest acquisition was as follows (amounts in thousands):

The Company has accounted for the ResortQuest acquisition under the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to ResortQuest’s net tangible and identifiable intangible assets based upon their fair value as of the date of completion of the ResortQuest acquisition. The Company determined these fair values with the assistance of a third party valuation expert. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill will not be amortized and will be tested for impairment on an annual basis and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that the goodwill may be impaired. The final allocation of the purchase price was subject to adjustments for a period not to exceed one year from the consummation date, the allocation period, in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” and EITF Issue 95-3 “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination.” The allocation of the purchase price was adjusted during this period and finalized on November 20, 2004, which resulted in certain adjustments to goodwill, accrued liabilities, deferred taxes, and additional paid-in capital. The purchase price allocation as of November 20, 2003 was as follows (in thousands):

11

Tangible assets acquired totaled $47.5 million, which included $9.8 million of restricted cash, $26.1 million of property and equipment and $7.0 million of net trade receivables. Included in the tangible assets acquired is ResortQuest’s vacation rental management software, First Resort Software (“FRS”), which was being amortized over a remaining estimated useful life of five years. On December 15, 2004, the Company sold certain assets related to FRS, including all copyrights, trademarks, tradenames, and maintenance and support agreements associated with the vacation rental management software, to Instant Software, Inc. for approximately $1.3 million in cash and the assumption of certain liabilities. The Company also received a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free license to continue using the vacation rental management software for its internal business purposes. The value assigned to this license is being amortized over a remaining estimated useful life of two years. The Company recognized a loss of $1.8 million on the sale of the FRS assets, which is reported in other gains and losses in the consolidated statement of operations.

Approximately $29.7 million was allocated to amortizable intangible assets consisting primarily of existing property management contracts and ResortQuest’s customer database. Property management contracts represent existing contracts with property owners, homeowner associations and other direct ancillary service contracts. Property management contracts are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining useful life of the contracts. Contracts originating in Hawaii are estimated to have a remaining useful life of ten years from acquisition, while contracts in the continental United States and Canada have a remaining estimated useful life of seven years from acquisition. The Company is amortizing the customer database over a two-year period.

Of the total purchase price, approximately $38.8 million was allocated to trade names consisting primarily of the “ResortQuest” trade name which is deemed to have an indefinite remaining useful life and therefore will not be amortized.

As of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, goodwill related to the ResortQuest acquisition totaled $159.0 million and $159.2 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company made adjustments to deferred taxes associated with the ResortQuest acquisition as a result of obtaining additional information. These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in goodwill of $0.2 million.

As of November 20, 2003, the Company recorded approximately $4.0 million of reserves and adjustments related to the Company’s plans to consolidate certain support functions, to adjust for employee benefits and to account for outstanding legal claims filed against ResortQuest as an adjustment to the purchase price allocation. The following table summarizes the activity related to these reserves for the three months ended March 31, 2005 (amounts in thousands):

12

7. DEBT:

Senior Loan and Mezzanine Loan

In 2001, the Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into two loan agreements, a $275.0 million senior loan (the “Senior Loan”) and a $100.0 million mezzanine loan (the “Mezzanine Loan”) (collectively, the “Nashville Hotel Loans”) with affiliates of Merrill Lynch & Company acting as principal. The Senior and Mezzanine Loan borrower and its member were subsidiaries formed for the purposes of owning and operating the Gaylord Opryland and entering into the loan transaction and are special-purpose entities whose activities are strictly limited. The Company fully consolidates these entities in its consolidated financial statements. The Senior Loan, which was repaid and terminated in November 2004 using proceeds of the 6.75% Senior Notes discussed below, was secured by a first mortgage lien on the assets of Gaylord Opryland. In March 2004, the Company exercised the first of two one-year extension options to extend the maturity of the Senior Loan to March 2005. Amounts outstanding under the Senior Loan bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 1.20%. The Mezzanine Loan, which was repaid and terminated in November 2003 using proceeds of the 8% Senior Notes discussed below, was secured by the equity interest in the wholly-owned subsidiary that owns Gaylord Opryland, was due in April 2004 and bore interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.0%. The Nashville Hotel Loans required monthly principal payments of approximately $0.7 million during their three-year terms in addition to monthly interest payments. The terms of the Senior Loan and the Mezzanine Loan required the Company to purchase interest rate hedges in notional amounts equal to the outstanding balances of the Senior Loan and the Mezzanine Loan in order to protect against adverse changes in one-month LIBOR. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company purchased instruments in 2001 that capped its exposure to one-month LIBOR at 7.5% as discussed in Note 9. These instruments expired in March 2004. Upon exercising its option to extend the maturity of the Senior Loan in March 2004, the Company purchased an instrument that capped its exposure to one-month LIBOR at 5.0% as discussed in Note 9. As a result of the repayment and termination of the Senior Loan, these instruments were terminated in November 2004. The Company used $235.0 million of the proceeds from the Nashville Hotel Loans to refinance the remaining outstanding portion of $235.0 million of an interim loan obtained from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc. in 2000. At closing, the Company was required to escrow certain amounts, including $20.0 million related to future renovations and related capital expenditures at Gaylord Opryland. The net proceeds from the Nashville Hotel Loans after refinancing of the interim loan and paying required escrows and fees were approximately $97.6 million.

During November 2003, the Company used the proceeds of the 8% Senior Notes, as discussed below, to repay in full $66.0 million outstanding under the Mezzanine Loan portion of the Nashville Hotel Loans. As a result of the repayment of the Mezzanine Loan, the Company wrote off $0.7 million in deferred financing costs during 2003.

During November 2004, the Company used the proceeds of the 6.75% Senior Notes, as discussed below, to repay in full $192.5 million outstanding under the Senior Loan portion of the Nashville Hotel Loans. As a result of the repayment of the Senior Loan, the Company wrote off $0.03 million in deferred financing costs during 2004.

Term Loan

During 2001, the Company entered into a three-year delayed-draw senior term loan (the “Term Loan”) of up to $210.0 million with Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc., Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and CIBC World Markets Corp. (collectively the “Banks”). During May 2003, the Company used $60 million of the proceeds from the 2003 Loans, as discussed below, to pay off the Term Loan. Concurrent with the payoff the Term Loan, the Company wrote off the remaining, unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.5 million related to the Term Loan. Proceeds of the Term Loan were used to finance the construction of Gaylord Palms and the initial construction phases of the Gaylord Texan, as well as for general operating purposes. The Term Loan was primarily secured by the Company’s ground lease interest in Gaylord Palms.

At the Company’s option, amounts outstanding under the Term Loan bore interest at the prime interest rate plus 2.125% or the one-month Eurodollar rate plus 3.375%. The terms of the Term Loan required the purchase of interest rate hedges

13

in notional amounts equal to $100.0 million in order to protect against adverse changes in the one-month Eurodollar rate. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company purchased instruments that cap its exposure to the one-month Eurodollar rate at 6.625% as discussed in Note 9. In addition, the Company was required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.375% per year of the average unused portion of the Term Loan.

2003 Loans

During May of 2003, the Company finalized a $225 million credit facility (the “2003 Loans”) with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Bank of America, N.A., CIBC Inc. and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2003 Loans consisted of a $25 million senior revolving facility, a $150 million senior term loan and a $50 million subordinated term loan. The 2003 Loans were due in 2006. The senior loan bore interest of LIBOR plus 3.5%. The subordinated loan bore interest of LIBOR plus 8.0%. The 2003 Loans were secured by the Gaylord Palms assets and the Gaylord Texan assets. At the time of closing the 2003 Loans, the Company engaged LIBOR interest rate swaps which fixed the LIBOR rates of the 2003 Loans at 1.48% in year one and 2.09% in year two. The interest rate swaps related to the 2003 Loans are discussed in more detail in Note 9. The Company was required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per year of the average daily unused portion of the 2003 Loans. Proceeds of the 2003 Loans were used to pay off the Term Loan of $60 million as discussed above and the remaining net proceeds of approximately $134 million were deposited into an escrow account for the completion of the construction of the Gaylord Texan. The provisions of the 2003 Loans contained covenants and restrictions including compliance with certain financial covenants, restrictions on additional indebtedness, escrowed cash balances, as well as other customary restrictions.

In connection with the offering of the 8% Senior Notes, on November 12, 2003 the Company amended the 2003 Loans to, among other things, permit the ResortQuest acquisition and the issuance of the 8% Senior Notes, maintain the $25.0 million revolving credit facility portion of the 2003 Loans, repay and eliminate the $150 million senior term loan portion and the $50 million subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans and make certain other amendments to the 2003 Loans. During November, 2003, as discussed below, the Company used the proceeds of the 8% Senior Notes to repay all amounts outstanding under the 2003 Loans. As a result of the prepayment of the 2003 Loans, the Company wrote off $6.6 million in deferred financing costs.

8% Senior Notes

On November 12, 2003, the Company completed its offering of $350 million in aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2013 in an institutional private placement. In January 2004, the Company filed an exchange offer registration statement on Form S-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to the 8% Senior Notes and exchanged the existing senior notes for publicly registered senior notes with the same terms after the registration statement was declared effective in April 2004. The interest rate on these notes is 8%, although the Company has entered into fixed to variable interest rate swaps with respect to $125 million principal amount of the 8% Senior Notes, which swaps result in an effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.95% with respect to that portion of the 8% Senior Notes. The 8% Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2013, bear interest semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2004. The 8% Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2008 at a designated redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 8% Senior Notes before November 15, 2006 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings. The 8% Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all the Company’s secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The 8% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by generally all of the Company’s active domestic subsidiaries including, following repayment of the Senior Loan arrangements, the subsidiaries owning the assets of Gaylord Opryland. In connection with the offering and subsequent registration of the 8% Senior Notes, the Company paid approximately $10.1 million in deferred financing costs. The net proceeds from the offering of the 8% Senior Notes, together with $22.5 million of the Company’s cash on hand, were used as follows:

14

The 8% Senior Notes indenture contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, capital expenditures, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The 8% Senior Notes are cross-defaulted to the Company’s other indebtedness.

2003 Revolving Credit Facility

On November 20, 2003, the Company entered into a new $65.0 million revolving credit facility, which was increased to $100.0 million on December 17, 2003. During March 2005, the Company replaced the 2003 revolving credit facility with the $600.0 million credit facility discussed below. The 2003 revolving credit facility, which replaced the revolving credit portion under the 2003 Loans, was scheduled to mature in May 2006. The 2003 revolving credit facility had an interest rate, at the Company’s election, of either LIBOR plus 3.50%, subject to a minimum LIBOR of 1.32%, or the lending banks’ base rate plus 2.25%. Interest on borrowings was payable quarterly, in arrears, for base rate loans and at the end of each interest rate period for LIBOR rate-based loans. Principal was payable in full at maturity. The 2003 revolving credit facility was guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by the Company’s subsidiaries that were guarantors of the 8% Senior Notes described above and the 6.75% Senior Notes described below, and was secured by a leasehold mortgage on the Gaylord Palms. The Company was required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per year of the average daily unused revolving portion of the 2003 revolving credit facility.

In addition, the 2003 revolving credit facility contained certain covenants which, among other things, limited the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, capital expenditures, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The material financial covenants, ratios or tests in the 2003 revolving credit facility were as follows:

15

6.75% Senior Notes

On November 30, 2004, the Company completed its offering of $225 million in aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2014 in an institutional private placement. The interest rate of these notes is 6.75%. The 6.75% Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2014, bear interest semi-annually in cash in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2005. The 6.75% Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2009 at a designated redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the 6.75% Senior Notes before November 15, 2007 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings. The 6.75% Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The 6.75% Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by generally all of the Company’s active domestic subsidiaries including, following repayment of the Senior Loan arrangements, the subsidiaries owning the assets of Gaylord Opryland. In connection with the offering of the 6.75% Senior Notes, the Company paid approximately $4.0 million in deferred financing costs. The net proceeds from the offering of the 6.75% Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, were used to repay the Senior Loan and to provide capital for growth of the Company’s other businesses and other general corporate purposes. In addition, the 6.75% Senior Notes indenture contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, capital expenditures, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The 6.75% Senior Notes are cross-defaulted to the Company’s other indebtedness.

In connection with the issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes, the Company entered into a Registration Rights Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company filed an exchange offer registration statement with the SEC on April 22, 2005. The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to have the exchange offer registration statement declared effective by the SEC on or prior to 240 days after November 30, 2004, the closing date of the 6.75% Senior Notes offering.

New $600.0 Million Credit Facility

On March 10, 2005, the Company entered into a new $600.0 million credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. acting as the administrative agent. The Company’s new credit facility consists of the following components: (a) a $300.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility, which includes a $50.0 million letter of credit sublimit, and (b) a $300.0 million senior secured delayed draw term loan facility, which may be drawn on in one or more advances during its term. The credit facility also includes an accordion feature that will allow the Company, on a one-time basis, to increase the credit facilities by a total of up to $300.0 million, subject to securing additional commitments from existing lenders or new lending institutions. The revolving loan, letters of credit and term loan mature on March 9, 2010. At the Company’s election, the revolving loans and the term loans may have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2% or the lending banks’ base rate plus 1%, subject to adjustments based on the Company’s financial performance. Interest on the Company’s borrowings is payable quarterly, in arrears, for base rate loans and at the end of each interest rate period for LIBOR rate-based loans. Principal is payable in full at maturity. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.25% to 0.50% per year of the average unused portion of the credit facility.

The purpose of the new credit facility is for working capital and capital expenditures and the financing of the costs and expenses related to the construction of the Gaylord National hotel. Construction of the Gaylord National hotel is required to be substantially completed by June 30, 2008 (subject to customary force majeure provisions).

The new credit facility is (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on the real property and related personal and intellectual property of the Company’s Gaylord Opryland hotel, Gaylord Texan hotel, Gaylord Palms hotel and Gaylord National hotel (to be constructed) and pledges of equity interests in the entities that own such properties and (ii) guaranteed by each of the four wholly owned subsidiaries that own the four hotels as well as ResortQuest International, Inc. Advances are subject to a 60% borrowing base, based on the appraisal values of the hotel properties (reducing to 50% in the event a

16

hotel property is sold). The Company’s 2003 revolving credit facility has been paid in full and the related mortgages and liens have been released.

In addition, the $600.0 million credit facility contains certain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, acquisitions, mergers and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such agreements. The material financial covenants, ratios or tests contained in the new credit facility are as follows:

As of March 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all covenants. As of March 31, 2005, no borrowings were outstanding under the $600.0 million credit facility, but the lending banks had issued $9.9 million of letters of credit under the credit facility for the Company. The credit facility is cross-defaulted to the Company’s other indebtedness.

8. SECURED FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACT:

During May 2000, the Company entered into a seven-year secured forward exchange contract (“SFEC”) with an affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston with respect to 10,937,900 shares of Viacom, Inc. Class B common stock (“Viacom Stock”). The seven-year SFEC has a notional amount of $613.1 million and required contract payments based upon a stated 5% rate. The SFEC protects the Company against decreases in the fair market value of the Viacom Stock while providing for participation in increases in the fair market value, as discussed below. The Company realized cash proceeds from the SFEC of $506.5 million, net of discounted prepaid contract payments and prepaid interest related to the first 3.25 years of the contract and transaction costs totaling $106.6 million. In October 2000, the Company prepaid the remaining 3.75 years of contract interest payments required by the SFEC of $83.2 million. As a result of the prepayment, the Company is not required to make any further contract payments during the seven-year term of the SFEC. Additionally, as a result of the prepayment, the Company was released from certain covenants of the SFEC, which related to sales of assets, additional indebtedness and liens. The unamortized balances of the prepaid contract interest are classified as current assets of $26.9 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and long-term assets of $30.7 million and $37.4 million as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively, in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company is recognizing the prepaid contract payments and deferred financing charges associated with the SFEC as interest expense over the seven-year contract period using the effective interest method. The Company utilized

17

$394.1 million of the net proceeds from the SFEC to repay all outstanding indebtedness under its 1997 revolving credit facility, and the 1997 revolving credit facility was terminated.

The Company’s obligation under the SFEC is collateralized by a security interest in the Company’s Viacom Stock. At the end of the seven-year contract term, the Company may, at its option, elect to pay in cash rather than by delivery of all or a portion of the Viacom Stock. The SFEC protects the Company against decreases in the fair market value of the Viacom Stock by way of a put option at a strike price below $56.05 per share, while providing for participation in increases in the fair market value of the Viacom Stock by way of a call option at a strike price of $64.45 per share as of March 31, 2005. The call option strike price decreased from $67.97 as of December 31, 2004 to $64.45 as of March 31, 2005 due to the Company receiving a dividend distribution from Viacom. Future dividend distributions received from Viacom may result in an adjusted call strike price. For any appreciation above $64.45 per share, the Company will participate in the appreciation at a rate of 25.93%.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended, certain components of the secured forward exchange contract are considered derivatives, as discussed in Note 9.

9. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce certain of its interest rate risks and to manage risk exposure to changes in the value of its Viacom Stock.

Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, the Company valued the SFEC based on pricing provided by a financial institution and reviewed by the Company. The financial institution’s market prices are prepared for each quarter close period on a mid-market basis by reference to proprietary models and do not reflect any bid/offer spread. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded net pretax gains in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations of $5.6 million and $45.1 million, respectively, related to the increase in the fair value of the derivatives associated with the SFEC.

During 2001, the Company entered into three contracts to cap its interest rate risk exposure on its long-term debt. Two of the contracts, which capped the Company’s exposure to one-month LIBOR rates on up to $375.0 million of outstanding indebtedness at 7.5%, expired in March 2004 as discussed in Note 7. Upon the expiration of these contracts, the Company entered into a contract to cap its exposure to one-month LIBOR rates on up to $197 million of outstanding indebtedness at 5.0% as discussed in Note 7. Another interest rate cap, which capped the Company’s exposure on one-month Eurodollar rates on up to $100.0 million of outstanding indebtedness at 6.625%, expired in October 2002. These interest rate caps qualified for treatment as cash flow hedges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended. As such, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument was initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss, if any, was recognized as income or expense immediately.

The Company also purchased LIBOR rate swaps as required by the 2003 Loans as discussed in Note 7. The Company hedged a notional amount of $200.0 million, although the 2003 Loans only required that 50% of the outstanding amount be hedged. The LIBOR rate swap effectively locked the variable interest rate at a fixed interest rate at 1.48% in year one and 2.09% in year two. The LIBOR rate swaps qualified for treatment as cash flow hedges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended. Anticipating the issuance of the 8% Senior Notes and the subsequent repayment of the 2003 Loans, the Company terminated $100.0 million of the LIBOR rate swaps effective October 31, 2003. Upon issuance of the 8% Senior Notes and the repayment of the 2003 Loans, the Company terminated the remaining $100.0 million of the LIBOR rate swaps effective November 12, 2003. The Company received proceeds from the termination of these LIBOR rate swaps in the amount of $0.2 million.

18

Upon issuance of the 8% Senior Notes, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements with a notional amount of $125.0 million to convert the fixed rate on $125.0 million of the 8% Senior Notes to a variable rate in order to access the lower borrowing costs that were available on floating-rate debt. Under these swap agreements, which mature on November 15, 2013, the Company receives a fixed rate of 8% and pays a variable rate, in arrears, equal to six-month LIBOR plus 2.95%. The terms of the swap agreement mirror the terms of the 8% Senior Notes, including semi-annual settlements on the 15^th of May and November each year. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended, changes in the fair value of this interest rate swap agreement must be offset against the corresponding change in fair value of the 8% Senior Notes through earnings. The Company has determined that there will not be an ineffective portion of this hedge and therefore, no impact on earnings. As of March 31, 2005, the Company determined that, based upon dealer quotes, the fair value of these interest rate swap agreements was $(0.3) million. The Company has recorded a derivative liability and an offsetting decrease in the balance of the 8% Senior Notes accordingly. As of December 31, 2004, the Company determined that, based upon dealer quotes, the fair value of these interest rate swap agreements was $0.5 million. The Company recorded a derivative asset and an offsetting increase in the balance of the 8% Senior Notes accordingly.

10. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:

The following table summarizes the activities of the Company’s restructuring charges for the three months ended March 31, 2005:

     2001 Restructuring Charge

During 2001, the Company recognized net pretax restructuring charges from continuing operations of $5.8 million related to streamlining operations and reducing layers of management. These restructuring charges were recorded in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into two subleases to lease certain office space the Company previously had recorded in the 2001 restructuring charges. As a result, the Company reversed $0.9 million of the 2001 restructuring charges during 2002 related to continuing operations based upon the occurrence of certain triggering events. Also during the second quarter of 2002, the Company evaluated the 2001 restructuring accrual and determined certain severance benefits and outplacement agreements had expired and adjusted the previously recorded amounts by $0.2 million. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company evaluated the 2001 restructuring accrual and determined that the remaining sublease payments it was scheduled to receive were less than originally estimated. During the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company again evaluated the 2001 restructuring accrual due to a continued decline in the creditworthiness of a sublessee and determined that the remaining sublease payments that it would collect were less than estimated during the second quarter of 2004. As a result of these evaluations, the Company increased the 2001 restructuring charge by $0.3 million during 2004 related to continuing operations. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had made all payments accrued under the 2001 restructuring accrual.

     2000 Restructuring Charge

During 2000, the Company completed an assessment of its strategic alternatives related to its operations and capital requirements and developed a strategic plan designed to refocus the Company’s operations, reduce its operating losses, and reduce its negative cash flows (the “2000 Strategic Assessment”). As part of the Company’s 2000 Strategic Assessment, the Company recognized pretax restructuring charges of $13.1 million related to continuing operations during 2000, in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3. Additional restructuring charges of $3.2 million during 2000 were included in discontinued operations. During 2001, the Company negotiated reductions in certain contract termination

19

costs, which allowed the reversal of $3.7 million of the restructuring charges originally recorded during 2000. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into a sublease that reduced the liability the Company was originally required to pay, and the Company reversed $0.1 million of the 2000 restructuring charge related to the reduction in required payments. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company evaluated the 2000 restructuring accrual and determined that the remaining severance payments it was scheduled to make were less than originally estimated. As a result, the Company reversed $0.1 million of the 2000 restructuring charge during 2004 related to continuing operations. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has recorded cash payments of $9.4 million against the 2000 restructuring accrual related to continuing operations. The remaining balance of the 2000 restructuring accrual at March 31, 2005 of $10,000, from continuing operations, is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, which the Company expects to be paid by the end of 2005.

11. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:

Cash paid for interest related to continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was comprised of:

Total capitalized interest for the three months ended March 31, 2004 was $5.1 million. Income taxes received (paid) were $0.4 million and $(0.8) million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Certain transactions have been reflected as non-cash activities in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2005, as further discussed below.

In March 2005, the Company donated 65,100 shares of Viacom stock with a market value of $2.3 million to a charitable foundation established by the Company, which was recorded as selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. This donation is reflected as an increase in net loss and a corresponding decrease in other assets and liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of cash flows.

In connection with the settlement of litigation with NHC on February 22, 2005, as further discussed in Note 16, the Company issued to NHC a 5-year, $5 million promissory note. Because the Company continued to accrue expense under the naming rights agreement throughout the course of this litigation, the issuance of this promissory note resulted in an increase in long term debt and capital lease obligations and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and statement of cash flows.

12. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES:

The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill by business segment for the three months ended March 31, 2005 are as follows (amounts in thousands):

During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company recorded goodwill of $3.0 million and $11.9 million related to the acquisitions of Whistler and East West Resorts, respectively, as further discussed in Note 6. During the three months ended March 31, 2005, the Company made adjustments to accrued liabilities associated with the East West Resorts acquisition and deferred taxes associated with the ResortQuest acquisition as a result of obtaining additional information. These adjustments resulted in a net decrease in goodwill of $0.1 million.

20

The carrying amount of indefinite-lived intangible assets not subject to amortization was $40.3 million and $40.6 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The gross carrying amount of amortized intangible assets in continuing operations was $38.3 million and $30.5 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The significant increase in amortized intangible assets during three months ended March 31, 2005 is due to the acquisitions of Whistler and East West Resorts, as discussed in Note 6. The related accumulated amortization of amortized intangible assets in continuing operations was $6.2 million and $4.5 million at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The amortization expense related to intangible assets from continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $1.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The estimated amounts of amortization expense for the next five years are as follows (in thousands):

21

13. STOCK PLANS:

SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to account for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method as prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations, under which no compensation cost related to employee stock options has been recognized. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123”. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide two additional methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require certain disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted the amended disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002, and the information contained in this report reflects the disclosure requirements of the new pronouncement. The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25.

If compensation cost for these plans had been determined consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net loss and loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 would have been increased to the following pro forma amounts:

At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, there were 3,936,988 and 3,586,551 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock reserved for future issuance pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options under its stock option and incentive plans. Under the terms of its plans, stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. Generally, stock options granted to non-employee directors are exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, while options granted to employees are exercisable ratably over a period of four years beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. The Company accounts for this plan under APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations, under which no compensation expense for employee and non-employee director stock options has been recognized.

The plan also provides for the award of restricted stock and restricted stock units. At March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, awards of 90,805 and 93,805 shares, respectively, of restricted common stock were outstanding. The market value

22

at the date of grant of these restricted shares was recorded as unearned compensation as a component of stockholders’ equity. Unearned compensation is amortized and expensed over the vesting period of the restricted stock.

The Company has an employee stock purchase plan whereby substantially all employees are eligible to participate in the purchase of designated shares of the Company’s common stock. Prior to January 1, 2005, participants in the plan purchased these shares at a price equal to 85% of the lower of the closing price at the beginning or end of each quarterly stock purchase period. Effective January 1, 2005, the plan was amended such that participants in the plan now purchase these shares at a price equal to 95% of the of the closing price at the end of each quarterly stock purchase period. The Company issued 2,605 and 3,199 shares of common stock at an average price per share of $38.38 and $25.43 pursuant to this plan during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Included in compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is $0.6 million related to the grant of 596,000 units and 599,500 units, respectively, under the Company’s Performance Accelerated Restricted Stock Unit Program which was implemented in the second quarter of 2003.

14. RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION PLANS:

The Company sponsors unfunded defined benefit postretirement health care and life insurance plans for certain employees. Effective December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Prescription Drug Act”) was enacted into law. The Prescription Drug Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare Part D as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D.

During May 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 106-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003”. This standard requires sponsors of defined benefit postretirement health care plans to make a reasonable determination whether (1) the prescription drug benefits under its plan are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and thus qualify for the subsidy under the Prescription Drug Act and (2) the expected subsidy will offset or reduce the employer’s share of the cost of the underlying postretirement prescription drug coverage on which the subsidy is based. Sponsors whose plans meet both of these criteria were required to re-measure the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic postretirement benefit expense of their plans to reflect the effects of the Prescription Drug Act in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after September 15, 2004.

During the second quarter of 2004, the Company determined that the prescription drug benefits provided under its postretirement health care plan were actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D and thus would qualify for the subsidy under the Prescription Drug Act and the expected subsidy would offset its share of the cost of the underlying drug coverage. The Company elected to early-adopt the provisions of FASB Staff Position No. 106-2 during the second quarter of 2004 and re-measured its accumulated postretirement benefit obligation and net periodic postretirement benefit expense accordingly. The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was reduced by $2.9 million during the second quarter of 2004 as a result of the subsidy related to benefits attributed to past service. This reduction in the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was recorded as a deferred actuarial gain and will be amortized over future periods in the same manner as other deferred actuarial gains. Because the Company re-measured its net period post retirement benefit expense during the second quarter of 2004, the effect of the subsidy had no impact on the measurement of net periodic postretirement benefit expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004.

Net periodic pension expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations included the following components for the three months ended March 31 (in thousands):

23

Net postretirement benefit expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations included the following components for the three months ended March 31 (in thousands):

15. NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), “Share Based Payment,” which replaces SFAS No. 123 and supercedes APB 25. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the measurement of all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, using a fair-value based method and the recording of such expense over the related vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R) also requires the recognition of compensation expense for the fair value of any unvested stock option awards outstanding at the date of adoption. The proforma disclosure previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No. 148 is no longer an alternative under SFAS No. 123(R). The effective date for adopting SFAS 123(R)

24

is the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005, which will be January 1, 2006 for the Company. Early adoption is permitted but not required. The Company plans to adopt the modified prospective method permitted under SFAS No. 123(R). Under this method, companies are required to record compensation expense for new and modified awards over the related vesting period of such awards prospectively and record compensation expense prospectively for the unvested portion, at the date of adoption, of previously issued and outstanding awards over the remaining vesting period of such awards. No change to prior periods is permitted under the modified prospective method. Based on the unvested stock option awards outstanding as of March 31, 2005 that are expected to remain unvested as of January 1, 2006, the Company expects to recognize additional pre-tax compensation expense during 2006 of approximately $4.8 million beginning in the first quarter of 2006 as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Future levels of compensation expense recognized related to stock option awards (including the aforementioned) may be impacted by new awards and/or modifications, repurchases and cancellations of existing awards before and after the adoption of this standard.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29”. The amendments made by SFAS No. 153 are based on the principle that exchanges of non-monetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. Further, the amendments eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replace it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS No. 153 is to be applied prospectively for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

16. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

On February 22, 2005, the Company concluded the settlement of litigation with the Nashville Hockey Club Limited Partnership (“NHC”), which owns the Nashville Predators NHL hockey team, over (i) NHC’s obligation to redeem the Company’s ownership interest, and (ii) the Company’s obligations under the Nashville Arena Naming Rights Agreement dated November 24, 1999. Under the Naming Rights Agreement, which had a 20-year term through 2018, the Company was required to make annual payments to NHC, beginning at $2,050,000 in 1999 and with a 5% escalation each year thereafter, and to purchase a minimum number of tickets to Predators games each year. At the closing of the settlement, NHC redeemed all of the Company’s outstanding limited partnership units in the Predators pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated February 22, 2005 effectively terminating the Company’s ownership interest in the Predators. In addition, the Naming Rights Agreement was cancelled pursuant to the Acknowledgment of Termination of Naming Rights Agreement. As a part of the settlement, the Company made a one-time cash payment to NHC of $4 million and issued to NHC a 5-year, $5 million promissory note bearing interest at 6% per annum. The note is payable at $1 million per year for 5 years, with the first payment due on the first anniversary of the resumption of NHL hockey in Nashville, Tennessee. The Company’s obligation to pay the outstanding amount under the note shall terminate immediately if, at any time before the note is paid in full, the Predators cease to be an NHL team playing their home games in Nashville, Tennessee. In addition, if the Predators cease to be an NHL team playing its home games in Nashville prior to the first payment under the note, then in addition to the note being cancelled, the Predators will pay the Company $4 million. If the Predators cease to be an NHL team playing its home games in Nashville after the first payment but prior to the second payment under the note, then in addition to the note being cancelled, the Predators will pay the Company $2 million. In addition, pursuant to a Consent Agreement among the Company, the National Hockey League and owners of NHC, the Company’s guaranty described below has been limited as described below. The Company continued to recognize the expense under the Naming Rights Agreement throughout the course of this litigation. As a result, the net effect of the settlement resulted in the Company reversing $2.4 million of expense previously accrued under the Naming Rights Agreement during the first quarter of 2005.

In connection with the Company’s execution of the Agreement of Limited Partnership of the Nashville Hockey Club, L.P. on June 25, 1997, the Company, its subsidiary CCK, Inc., Craig Leipold, Helen Johnson-Leipold (Mr. Leipold’s wife) and Samuel C. Johnson (Mr. Leipold’s father-in-law) entered into a guaranty agreement executed in favor of the National Hockey League (NHL). This agreement provides for a continuing guarantee of the following obligations for as long as any of these obligations remain outstanding: (i) all obligations under the expansion agreement between the Nashville Hockey Club, L.P. and the NHL; and (ii) all operating expenses of the Nashville

25

Hockey Club, L.P. The maximum potential amount which the Company and CCK, collectively, could be liable under the guaranty agreement is $15.0 million, although the Company and CCK would have recourse against the other guarantors if required to make payments under the guarantee. In connection with the legal settlement with the Nashville Predators consummated on February 22, 2005, as described above, this guaranty has been limited so that the Company is not responsible for any debt, obligation or liability of Nashville Hockey Club, L.P. that arises from any act, omission or circumstance occurring after the date of the legal settlement. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had not recorded any liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheet associated with this guarantee.

Certain of the Company’s ResortQuest subsidiary’s property management agreements in Hawaii contain provisions for guaranteed levels of returns to the owners. These agreements, which have remaining terms of up to approximately 7 years, also contain force majeure clauses to protect the Company from forces or occurrences beyond the control of management.

On February 24, 2005, the Company acquired approximately 42 acres of land and related land improvements in Prince George’s County, Maryland (Washington D.C. area) for approximately $29 million on which it plans to develop a hotel to be known as the Gaylord National Resort & Convention Center. Approximately $17 million of this was paid in the first quarter of 2005, with the remainder payable upon completion of various phases of the project. The Company currently expects to open the hotel in 2008. In connection with this project, Prince George’s County, Maryland approved, in July 2004, two bond issues related to the development. The first bond issuance, in the amount of $65 million, will support the cost of infrastructure being constructed by the project developer, such as roads, water and sewer lines. The second bond issuance, in the amount of $95 million, will be issued directly to the Company upon completion of the project. The Company will initially hold the bonds and receive the debt service thereon which is payable from tax increment, hotel tax and special hotel rental taxes generated from our development. As of March 31, 2005, the Company had not entered into any material construction commitments associated with this project. The Company is also considering other potential hotel sites throughout the country. The timing and extent of any of these development projects is uncertain.

The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in certain legal actions and claims on a variety of other matters. It is the opinion of management that such legal actions will not have a material effect on the results of operations, financial condition or liquidity of the Company.

26

17. FINANCIAL REPORTING BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS:

The Company’s continuing operations are organized and managed based upon its products and services. The following information from continuing operations is derived directly from the segments’ internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes.

27

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 12, 2005, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement to purchase the Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel in Honolulu, Hawaii for a purchase price of $107 million and, at that time, announced that it anticipated securing a partner to fund the majority of the equity required for the purchase. On May 2, 2005, the Company announced the execution of a non-binding term sheet with a private real estate fund managed by DB Real Estate Opportunities Group with respect to the sale of an 80.1% interest in this property. Upon the completion of the property acquisition and the equity investment by the real estate fund (which investment is subject to definitive documentation and due diligence), the Company expects its gross investment in the property to be in the $5 million to $7 million range. The term sheet also calls for ResortQuest to manage the property under a long-term management agreement. On May 5, 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved these transactions, and the Company currently expects to complete these transactions in the second quarter of 2005.

The Company has learned that Bass Pro intends to amend its previously issued historical financial statements to reflect certain changes, which result primarily from a change in the manner in which Bass Pro accounts for its long term leases. These changes, which the Company believes will be finalized during the second quarter of 2005, will decrease Bass Pro’s net income for previous years. Based on information provided by Bass Pro to the Company to date, the Company does not believe these changes will be material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, and the Company intends to reflect the change in a one-time adjustment during the second quarter of 2005.

19. INFORMATION CONCERNING GUARANTOR AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES:

Prior to the issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes and repayment of the Senior Loan on November 30, 2004, as discussed in Note 7, not all of the Company’s subsidiaries guaranteed the 8% Senior Notes. All of the Company’s subsidiaries that were borrowers under, or had guaranteed, the Company’s 2003 revolving credit facility or previously, the Company’s 2003 Florida/Texas senior secured credit facility, were guarantors of the 8% Senior Notes (the “Former Guarantors”). Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, including those that incurred the Company’s Nashville Hotel Loan or owned or managed the Nashville loan borrower (the “Former Non-Guarantors”), did not guarantee the 8% Senior Notes. However, subsequent to the issuance of the 6.75% Senior Notes and repayment of the Senior Loan on November 30, 2004, the 8% Senior Notes and 6.75% Senior Notes became guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by generally all of the Company’s active domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”). As a result, the Company has classified the balance sheet, results of operations, and cash flows of the subsidiaries that incurred the Company’s Nashville Hotel Loan or owned or managed the Nashville loan borrower as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as guarantor subsidiaries in the consolidating financial information presented below. The results of operations and cash flows of these subsidiaries for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are classified as non-guarantor subsidiaries in the consolidating financial information presented below. The Company’s investment in Bass Pro and certain other discontinued operations remained non-guarantors of the 8% Senior Notes and 6.75% Senior Notes after repayment of the Senior Loan, so the Company has classified the balance sheet, results of operations and cash flows of these subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as non-guarantor subsidiaries (the “Non-Guarantors”) in the consolidating financial information presented below. The condensed consolidating financial information includes certain allocations of revenues and expenses based on management’s best estimates, which are not necessarily indicative of financial position, results of operations and cash flows that these entities would have achieved on a stand-alone basis.

28

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005

29

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004

30

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

March 31, 2005

31

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

December 31, 2004

32

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005