SEC Filing | Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.

View:

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY - FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)
x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003

		or

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-13079

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


Delaware		73-0664379

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

One Gaylord Drive
Nashville, Tennessee 37214
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)

(615) 316-6000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding as of October 31, 2003

Common Stock, $.01 par value		33,882,489 shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS


	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	Part I — Financial Information
	Item 1. — Financial Statements
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
	ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
	ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
	PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
	ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
	ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
	ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
	ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
SIGNATURES
EX-10.2 GUARANTY BY CRAIG LEIPOLD JUNE 25, 1997
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO
EX-32.1 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO & CFO

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003
INDEX


			Page No.

Part I — Financial Information
	Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002		3
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002		4
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002		5
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002		6
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			23
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			42
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures			43
Part II — Other Information
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings			44
	Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds			44
	Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities			44
	Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			44
	Item 5. Other Information			44
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K			44

Part I — Financial Information

Item 1. — Financial Statements

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)


			2003			2002

Revenues			$	98,101		$	100,421
Operating expenses:
	Operating costs			63,527			59,380
	Selling, general and administrative			24,621			26,909
	Preopening costs			3,283			1,867
	Gain on sale of assets			—			(19,962	)
	Depreciation			13,235			12,984
	Amortization			1,332			949

		Operating income (loss)		(7,897	)		18,294
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized				(10,476	)		(11,939	)
Interest income				742			840
Unrealized loss on Viacom stock				(58,976	)		(42,032	)
Unrealized gain on derivatives				32,976			60,667
Other gains and (losses), net				152			787

		Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		(43,479	)		26,617
Provision (benefit) for income taxes				(19,072	)		7,283

		Income (loss) from continuing operations		(24,407	)		19,334
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes				35,150			80,710

		Net income	$	10,743		$	100,044

Income (loss) per share:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.72	)	$	0.57
	Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			1.04			2.39

	Net income		$	0.32		$	2.96

Income (loss) per share — assuming dilution:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.72	)	$	0.57
	Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			1.04			2.39

	Net income		$	0.32		$	2.96

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)


			2003			2002

Revenues			$	317,951		$	296,015
Operating expenses:
	Operating costs			191,933			188,888
	Selling, general and administrative			79,941			76,363
	Preopening costs			7,111			7,946
	Gain on sale of assets			—			(30,529	)
	Restructuring charges, net			—			50
	Depreciation			39,661			39,237
	Amortization			3,783			2,688

		Operating income (loss)		(4,478	)		11,372
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized				(31,139	)		(36,289	)
Interest income				1,773			1,917
Unrealized loss on Viacom stock				(27,067	)		(39,611	)
Unrealized gain on derivatives				24,016			80,805
Other gains and (losses), net				435			665

		Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations		(36,460	)		18,859
Provision (benefit) for income taxes				(15,974	)		1,605

		Income (loss) from continuing operations, before discontinued operations and cumulative effect of accounting change		(20,486	)		17,254
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes				36,126			83,093
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes				—			(2,572	)

	Net income		$	15,640		$	97,775

Income (loss) per share:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.61	)	$	0.51
	Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			1.07			2.46
	Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—			(0.08	)

	Net income		$	0.46		$	2.89

Income (loss) per share — assuming dilution:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(0.61	)	$	0.51
	Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			1.07			2.46
	Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—			(0.08	)

	Net income		$	0.46		$	2.89

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)


				September 30,			December 31,
				2003			2002

ASSETS
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents — unrestricted			$	24,772		$	98,632
	Cash and cash equivalents — restricted				150,543			19,323
	Trade receivables, less allowance of $885 and $467, respectively				21,271			22,374
	Deferred financing costs				29,462			26,865
	Deferred income taxes				20,553			20,553
	Other current assets				27,647			25,889
	Current assets of discontinued operations				2,185			4,095

		Total current assets			276,433			217,731

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation					1,238,002			1,110,163
Goodwill					6,915			6,915
Amortized intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization					1,970			1,996
Investments					482,012			509,080
Estimated fair value of derivative assets					200,274			207,727
Long-term deferred financing costs					78,177			100,933
Other long-term assets					22,370			24,323
Long-term assets of discontinued operations					8,398			13,328

		Total assets		$	2,314,551		$	2,192,196

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
	Current portion of long-term debt			$	74,543		$	8,526
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities				85,710			80,685
	Current liabilities of discontinued operations				3,167			6,652

			Total current liabilities		163,420			95,863

Secured forward exchange contract					613,054			613,054
Long-term debt, net of current portion					393,842			332,112
Deferred income taxes, net					246,962			244,372
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities					17,177			48,647
Other long-term liabilities					70,981			67,895
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations					828			789
Minority interest of discontinued operations					2,019			1,885
Stockholders’ equity:
	Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding				—			—
	Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000 shares authorized, 33,852 and 33,780 shares issued and outstanding, respectively				339			338
	Additional paid-in capital				523,330			520,796
	Retained earnings				298,438			282,798
	Other stockholders’ equity				(15,839	)		(16,353	)

		Total stockholders’ equity			806,268			787,579

		Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	2,314,551		$	2,192,196

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)


				2003			2002

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
	Net income			$	15,640		$	97,775
	Amounts to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
		Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			(36,126	)		(83,093	)
		Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes			—			2,572
		Unrealized (gain) loss on Viacom stock and related derivatives			3,051			(41,194	)
		Gain on sale of assets			—			(30,529	)
		Depreciation and amortization			43,444			41,925
		Benefit for deferred income taxes			(21,121	)		(4,439	)
		Amortization of deferred financing costs			28,154			27,054
		Changes in (net of acquisitions and divestitures):
			Trade receivables		1,103			(20,882	)
			Income tax refund received		1,450			64,598
			Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		4,693			(2,349	)
			Other assets and liabilities		4,163			12,140

	Net cash flows provided by operating activities — continuing operations				44,451			63,578
	Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities — discontinued operations				2,524			(366	)

	Net cash flows provided by operating activities				46,975			63,212

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
	Purchases of property and equipment				(167,428	)		(105,892	)
	Sale of assets				—			30,875
	Other investing activities				(2,578	)		(242	)

		Net cash flows used in investing activities — continuing operations			(170,006	)		(75,259	)
		Net cash flows provided by investing activities — discontinued operations			59,485			232,745

		Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities			(110,521	)		157,486

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
	Repayment of long-term debt				(72,003	)		(200,054	)
	Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt				200,000			85,000
	Deferred financing costs paid				(7,793	)		—
	(Increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents				(131,220	)		49,913
	Proceeds from exercise of stock option and purchase plans				1,287			856
	Other financing activities, net				(491	)		1,314

		Net cash flows used in financing activities — continuing operations			(10,220	)		(62,971	)
		Net cash flows used in financing activities — discontinued operations			(94	)		(839	)

		Net cash flows used in financing activities			(10,314	)		(63,810	)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents					(73,860	)		156,888
Cash and cash equivalents — unrestricted, beginning of period					98,632			9,194

Cash and cash equivalents — unrestricted, end of period				$	24,772		$	166,082

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gaylord Entertainment Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”) and have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the financial information presented not misleading. It is recommended that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2002, as amended in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 18, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods have been included. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for such interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.

2. INCOME PER SHARE:

The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is calculated as follows:


(in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Weighted average shares outstanding		33,849		33,769		33,818		33,759
Effect of dilutive stock options		36		3		22		41

Weighted average shares outstanding - assuming dilution		33,885		33,772		33,840		33,800

3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:

Comprehensive income is as follows for the three months and nine months of the respective periods:


(in thousands)		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,

		2003		2002		2003		2002

Net income		$	10,743	$	100,044	$	15,640	$	97,775
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate hedges			77		33		227		(229	)
Foreign currency translation			—		—		—		792

	Comprehensive income	$	10,820	$	100,077	$	15,867	$	98,338

4. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, which superseded SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of” and the accounting and reporting provisions for the disposal of a segment of a business of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions”. SFAS No. 144 retains the requirements of SFAS No. 121 for the recognition and measurement of an impairment loss and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include a component of an entity (rather than a segment of a business).

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, the Company has presented the operating results, financial position, cash flows and any gain or loss on disposal of the following businesses as discontinued operations in its financial statements as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002: WSM-FM, WWTN(FM), Acuff-Rose Music Publishing, the Oklahoma Redhawks (the “Redhawks”), Word Entertainment (“Word”), and the Company’s international cable networks.

WSM-FM and WWTN(FM)

During the first quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM) (collectively, the “Radio operations”). Subsequent to committing to a plan of disposal during the first quarter, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement to sell the assets primarily used in the operations of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM) to Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. (“Cumulus”) in exchange for approximately $62.5 million in cash. In connection with this agreement, the Company also entered into a local marketing agreement with Cumulus pursuant to which, from April 21, 2003 until the closing of the sale of the assets, the Company, for a fee, made available to Cumulus substantially all of the broadcast time on WSM-FM and WWTN(FM). In turn, Cumulus provided programming to be broadcast during such broadcast time and collected revenues from the advertising that it sold for broadcast during this programming time. On July 21, 2003, the Company finalized the sale of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM) for approximately $62.5 million and recognized a pretax gain on the sale during the third quarter of 2003 of approximately $54.6 million. At the time of the sale, net proceeds of approximately $50 million were placed in restricted cash for completion of the Gaylord hotel in Texas. Concurrently, the Company also entered into a joint sales agreement with Cumulus for WSM-AM in exchange for $2.5 million in cash. The Company will continue to own and operate WSM-AM, and under the terms of the joint sales agreement with Cumulus, Cumulus will be responsible for all sales of commercial advertising on WSM-AM and will provide certain sales promotion, billing and collection services relating to WSM-AM, all for a specified commission. The joint sales agreement has a term of five years.

Acuff-Rose Music Publishing

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of its Acuff-Rose Music Publishing catalog entity. During the third quarter of 2002, the Company finalized the sale of the Acuff-Rose Music Publishing catalog entity to Sony/ATV Music Publishing for approximately $157.0 million in cash before royalties payable to Sony for the period beginning July 1, 2002 until the sale date. Proceeds of $25.0 million were used to reduce the Company’s outstanding indebtedness. During the third quarter of 2003, the Company revised its estimates of reserves previously established for certain sale-related transaction costs resulting in a reduction in the reserve of $0.5 million.

OKC Redhawks

During the first quarter of 2002, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of its ownership interests in the Redhawks, a minor league baseball team based in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. During the third quarter 2003, the Company agreed to sell its interests in the Redhawks. The sale is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2003 for an immaterial gain.

Word Entertainment

The Company committed to a plan to sell Word during the third quarter of 2001. During January 2002, the Company sold Word’s domestic operations to an affiliate of Warner Music Group for $84.1 million in cash. The Company recognized a pretax gain of $0.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002, related to the sale in discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Proceeds from the sale of $80.0 million were used to reduce the Company’s outstanding indebtedness. During the third quarter of 2003, due to the expiration of certain indemnification periods as specified in the sales contract, the previously established indemnification reserve of $1.5 million was reversed.

International Cable Networks

On June 1, 2001, the Company adopted a formal plan to dispose of its international cable networks. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company finalized a transaction to sell certain assets of its Asia and Brazil networks. The terms of this transaction included the assignment of certain transponder leases, which resulted in a reduction of the Company’s transponder lease liability and a related $3.8 million pretax gain, during the first quarter of 2002, which is reflected in discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company guaranteed $0.9 million in future lease payments by the assignee from the date of the sale until December 31, 2002. At the time the Company entered into the guarantee, the Company recorded the associated liability of $0.9 million. Due to the assignee’s failure to pay the lease liability during the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company was required to pay the lease payments. The Company is not required to pay any future lease payments related to the transponder lease. In addition, the Company ceased its operations based in Argentina during 2002.

The following table reflects the results of operations of businesses accounted for as discontinued operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30:


(in thousands)			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			September 30,						September 30,

			2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenues:
	Radio operations		$	360		$	2,764		$	3,703		$	7,344
	Acuff-Rose Music Publishing			—			—			—			7,654
	Redhawks			2,137			2,557			5,000			6,048
	Word			—			—			—			2,594
	International cable networks			—			—			—			744

		Total revenues of discontinued operations	$	2,497		$	5,321		$	8,703		$	24,384

Operating income (loss):
	Radio operations		$	89		$	741		$	613		$	661
	Acuff-Rose Music Publishing			—			(460	)		—			933
	Redhawks			497			711			529			974
	Word			—			(11	)		—			(917	)
	International cable networks			—			—			—			(1,576	)

		Total operating income of discontinued operations		586			981			1,142			75
Interest expense				(1	)		—			(1	)		(80	)
Interest income				2			11			7			61
Other gains and (losses), net				56,885			130,790			57,239			135,393

Income before provision for income taxes				57,472			131,782			58,387			135,449
Provision for income taxes				22,322			51,072			22,261			52,356

Income from discontinued operations			$	35,150		$	80,710		$	36,126		$	83,093

The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are comprised of:


(in thousands)				September 30,		December 31,
				2003		2002

Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	1,919	$	1,812
	Trade receivables, less allowance of $0 and $490, respectively				112		1,600
	Inventories				154		163
	Prepaid expenses				—		127
	Other current assets				—		393

		Total current assets			2,185		4,095
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation					3,256		5,157
Goodwill					—		3,527
Amortizable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization					3,942		3,942
Other long-term assets					1,200		702

		Total long-term assets			8,398		13,328

			Total assets	$	10,583	$	17,423

Current liabilities:
	Current portion of long-term debt			$	—	$	94
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses				3,167		6,558

		Total current liabilities			3,167		6,652
Other long-term liabilities					828		789

	Total long-term liabilities				828		789

	Total liabilities				3,995		7,441

	Minority interest of discontinued operations				2,019		1,885

		Total liabilities and minority interest of discontinued operations		$	6,014	$	9,326

5. DEBT:

2003 Loans

During May of 2003, the Company finalized a $225 million credit facility (the “2003 Loans”) with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Bank of America, N.A., CIBC Inc. and a syndicate of other lenders. The 2003 Loans consist of a $25 million senior revolving facility, a $150 million senior term loan and a $50 million subordinated term loan. The 2003 Loans are due in 2006. The senior loan bears interest of LIBOR plus 3.5%. The subordinated loan bears interest of LIBOR plus 8.0%. The 2003 Loans are secured by the Gaylord Palms assets and the Gaylord hotel in Texas. At the time of closing the 2003 Loans, the Company engaged LIBOR interest rate swaps which fixed the LIBOR rates of the 2003 Loans at 1.48% in year one and 2.09% in year two. The interest rate swaps related to the 2003 Loans are discussed in more detail in Note 7. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per year of the average daily unused portion of the 2003 Loans. At the end of the third quarter of 2003, the Company had 100% borrowing capacity of the $25 million revolver. Proceeds of the 2003 Loans were used to pay off the Term Loan of $60 million as discussed below and the remaining net proceeds of approximately $134 million were deposited into an escrow account for the completion of the construction of the Gaylord hotel in Texas. At September 30, 2003 the unamortized balance of the 2003 Loans deferred financing costs were $2.6 million in current assets and $4.3 million in long-term assets. The provisions of the 2003 Loans contain covenants and restrictions including compliance with certain financial covenants, restrictions on additional indebtedness, escrowed cash balances, as well as other customary restrictions. As of September 30, 2003, the Company was in compliance with all covenants under the 2003 loans.

Term Loan

During 2001, the Company entered into a three-year delayed-draw senior term loan (the “Term Loan”) of up to $210.0 million with Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown Inc., Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. and CIBC World Markets Corp. (collectively the “Banks”). During May 2003, the Company used $60 million of the proceeds from the 2003 Loans to pay off the Term Loan. Concurrent with the payoff of the Term Loan, the Company expensed the remaining, unamortized deferred financing costs of $1.5 million related to the Term Loan. The $1.5 million is recorded as interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. Proceeds of the Term Loan were used to finance the construction of Gaylord Palms and the initial construction phases of the Gaylord hotel in Texas as well as for general operating purposes. The Term Loan was primarily secured by the Company’s ground lease interest in Gaylord Palms.

Senior Loan and Mezzanine Loan

interim loan obtained from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc. in 2000 (the “Interim Loan”). At closing, the Company was required to escrow certain amounts, including $20.0 million related to future renovations and related capital expenditures at Gaylord Opryland. The net proceeds from the Nashville Hotel Loans after refinancing of the Interim Loan and paying required escrows and fees were approximately $97.6 million. At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the unamortized balance of the deferred financing costs related to the Nashville Hotel Loans was $2.8 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for the Senior Loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, including amortization of deferred financing costs, were 4.3% and 4.5%, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for the Mezzanine Loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, including amortization of deferred financing costs, were 10.7% and 10.3%, respectively.

The terms of the Nashville Hotel Loans require that the Company maintain certain escrowed cash balances and comply with certain financial covenants, and impose limits on transactions with affiliates and indebtedness. The financial covenants under the Nashville Hotel Loans are structured such that noncompliance at one level triggers certain cash management restrictions and noncompliance at a second level results in an event of default. Based upon the financial covenant calculations at December 31, 2002, the cash management restrictions were in effect which requires that all excess cash flows, as defined, be escrowed and may be used to repay principal amounts owed on the Senior Loan. During 2002, the Company negotiated certain revisions to the financial covenants under the Nashville Hotel Loans and the Term Loan. In the first quarter of 2003, the noncompliance level which triggered cash management restrictions was cured and the cash management restrictions were lifted. As of September 30, 2003, the Company is in compliance with the financial covenants related to cash management restrictions. There can be no assurance that the Company will remain in compliance with the covenants under the Nashville Hotel Loans. Any event of noncompliance that results in an event of default under the Nashville Hotel Loans would enable the lenders to demand payment of all outstanding amounts, which would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Accrued interest payable at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was $0.5 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Completion of Senior Notes Offering

Subsequent to the third quarter of 2003, the Company completed, on November 12, 2003, its offering of $350 million in aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2013 (the “Senior Notes”) in an institutional private placement, increased from the $225 million proposed offering previously announced. The interest rate of the Senior Notes is 8%. The Company has also entered into interest rate swaps with respect to $125 million principal amount of the Senior Notes which results in an effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.95% for that portion of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2013, bear interest semi-annually with respect to that portion of the Senior Notes in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2004. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2008 at a designated redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Senior Notes before November 15, 2006 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings. The Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantor under the 2003 Loans. The net proceeds from the offering of the Senior Notes, together with the Company’s cash on hand, were used as follows:

	•		$275.6 million was used to repay the $150 million senior term loan portion and the $50 million subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans, as well as the remaining $66 million of the Company’s $100 million Mezzanine Loan and to pay certain estimated fees and expenses related to the ResortQuest acquisition as discussed in Note 16; and

	•		$79.2 million was placed in escrow pending consummation of the ResortQuest acquisition, at which time that amount will be used, together with available cash, to repay ResortQuest’s senior notes and its credit facility.

If the ResortQuest acquisition is not consummated on or prior to May 31, 2004, (i) the Company will be required to redeem Senior Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $75.0 million at a redemption price equal to 101% of their aggregate principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the redemption date (the “Special Redemption”), and (ii) $275.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes would remain outstanding.

Amendment to 2003 Loans

In connection with the offering of the Senior Notes and the ResortQuest acquisition, on November 12, 2003 the Company amended the 2003 Loans to, among other things, permit the ResortQuest acquisition and the issuance of the Senior Notes, maintain the $25.0 million revolving credit facility portion of the 2003 Loans, to repay and eliminate the $150 million senior term loan portion and the $50 million subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans and make certain other amendments to the 2003 Loans.

New Revolving Credit Facility

The Company has received a commitment from certain of its bank lenders under the 2003 Loans to provide a $65.0 million revolving credit facility following the issuance of the Senior Notes and repayment of amounts outstanding under the 2003 Loans (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”). The New Revolving Credit Facility will replace the $25.0 million revolving credit facility portion of the 2003 loans. It is expected that the New Revolving Credit Facility will mature in May 2006 and borrowings thereunder will bear interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 3.50% or the lending banks’ base rate plus 2.25%. The New Revolving Credit Facility is expected to be guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries that are guarantors or borrowers under the 2003 Loans and will be secured by a leasehold mortgage on the Gaylord Palms. The Company anticipates that the New Revolving Credit Facility will require it to achieve substantial completion and initial opening of the Gaylord hotel in Texas by June 30, 2004. Effectiveness of the New Revolving Credit Facility is subject to customary closing conditions, including the negotiation and execution of definitive documentation.

6. SECURED FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACT:

During May 2000, the Company entered into a seven-year secured forward exchange contract (“SFEC”) with an affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston with respect to 10,937,900 shares of Viacom Class B Common Stock (the “Viacom Stock”). The seven-year SFEC has a notional amount of $613.1 million and required contract payments based upon a stated 5% rate. The SFEC protects the Company against decreases in the fair market value of the Viacom Stock while providing for participation in increases in the fair market value, as discussed below. The Company realized cash proceeds from the SFEC of $506.5 million, net of discounted prepaid contract payments and prepaid interest related to the first 3.25 years of the contract and transaction costs totaling $106.6 million. In October 2000, the Company prepaid the remaining 3.75 years of contract interest payments required by the SFEC of $83.2 million. As a result of the prepayment, the Company will not be required to make any further contract payments during the seven-year term of the SFEC. Additionally, as a result of the prepayment, the Company was released from certain covenants of the SFEC, which related to sales of assets, additional indebtedness and liens. The unamortized balances of the prepaid contract interest are classified as current assets of $26.9 million as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and long-term assets of $71.1 million and $91.2 million in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. The Company is recognizing the prepaid contract payments and deferred financing charges associated with the SFEC as interest expense over the seven-year contract period using the effective interest method.

In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended, certain components of the SFEC are considered derivatives, as discussed in Note 7.

7. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

The Company purchased LIBOR rate swaps as required by the 2003 Loans as discussed in Note 5. The LIBOR rate swap effectively locks the variable interest rate at a fixed interest rate at 1.48% in year one and 2.09% in year two. The LIBOR rate swaps qualify for treatment as cash flow hedges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended.

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce interest rate risks and to manage risk exposure to changes in the value of its Viacom Stock. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded net pretax gain in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations of $33.0 million and $60.7 million, respectively, related to the increase in the fair value of the derivatives associated with the SFEC.

During 2001, the Company entered into three contracts to cap its interest rate risk exposure on its Nashville Hotel Loan. Two of the contracts cap the Company’s exposure to one-month LIBOR rates on up to $375.0 million of outstanding indebtedness at 7.5%. Another interest rate cap, which caps the Company’s exposure on one-month Eurodollar rates on up to $100.0 million of outstanding indebtedness at 6.625%, expired in October 2002. These interest rate caps qualify for treatment as cash flow hedges in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133, as amended. As such, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is initially recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholder’s equity and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss, if any, is reported in income (expense) immediately.

8. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES:

The following table summarizes the activities of the restructuring charges liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003:


(in thousands)	Balance at		Restructuring charges				Balance at
	December 31, 2002		and adjustments		Payments		September 30, 2003

2001 restructuring charges	$	431	$	—	$	288	$	143
2000 restructuring charges		270		—		57		213

	$	701	$	—	$	345	$	356

2002 Restructuring Charge

As part of the Company’s ongoing assessment of operations, the Company identified certain duplication of duties within divisions and realized the need to streamline those tasks and duties. Related to this assessment, during the second quarter of 2002 the Company adopted a plan of restructuring to streamline certain operations and duties. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pretax restructuring charge of $1.1 million related to employee severance costs and other employee benefits. The restructuring charges all relate to continuing operations. These restructuring charges were recorded in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue (“EITF”) No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)”. At December 31, 2002, the balance of the 2002 restructuring accrual was zero.

2001 Restructuring Charges

During 2001, the Company recognized net pretax restructuring charges from continuing operations of $5.8 million related to streamlining operations and reducing layers of management. These restructuring charges were recorded in accordance with EITF No. 94-3. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into two subleases to lease certain office space the Company previously had recorded in the 2001 restructuring charges. As a result, the Company reversed $0.9 million of the 2001 restructuring charges during 2002 related to continuing operations based upon the occurrence of certain triggering events. Also during the second quarter of 2002, the Company evaluated the 2001 restructuring accrual and determined certain severance benefits and outplacement agreements had expired and adjusted the previously recorded amounts by $0.2 million. As of September 30, 2003, the Company has recorded cash payments of $4.7 million against the 2001 restructuring accrual. The remaining balance of the 2001 restructuring accrual at September 30, 2003 of $0.1 million is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company expects the remaining balances of the 2001 restructuring accrual to be paid by 2005.

2000 Restructuring Charges

As part of the Company’s 2000 strategic assessment, the Company recognized pretax restructuring charges of $13.1 million related to continuing operations during 2000, in accordance with EITF Issue No. 94-3. Additional restructuring charges of $3.2 million during 2000 were included in discontinued operations. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into a sublease that reduced the liability the Company was originally required to pay, and the Company reversed $0.1 million of the 2000 restructuring charge related to the reduction in required payments. During 2001, the Company negotiated reductions in certain contract termination costs, which allowed the reversal of $3.7 million of the restructuring charges originally recorded during 2000. As of September 30, 2003, the Company has recorded cash payments of $9.4 million against the 2000 restructuring accrual related to continuing operations. The remaining balance of the 2000 restructuring accrual at September 30, 2003 of $0.2 million, from continuing operations, is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet, which the Company expects to be paid by 2005.

9. GAIN ON SALE OF ASSETS:

During 1998, the Company entered into a partnership with The Mills Corporation to develop the Opry Mills Shopping Center in Nashville, Tennessee. The Company held a one-third interest in the partnership as well as the title to the land on which the shopping center was constructed, which was being leased to the partnership. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold its partnership share to certain affiliates of The Mills Corporation for approximately $30.8 million in cash proceeds upon the disposition. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate”, and other applicable pronouncements, the Company deferred approximately $20.0 million of the gain representing the estimated present value of the continuing land lease interest between the Company and the Opry Mills partnership at June 30, 2002. The Company recognized approximately $10.6 million of the proceeds, net of certain transaction costs, as a gain during the second quarter of 2002. During the third quarter of 2002, the Company sold its interest in the land lease and recognized the remaining $20.0 million deferred gain, less certain transaction costs.

10. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:

Cash paid for interest related to continuing operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 was comprised of:


(in thousands)	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Debt interest paid	$	5,446		$	4,555		$	13,024		$	14,060
Deferred financing costs paid		29			—			7,598			—
Capitalized interest		(4,057	)		(1,658	)		(10,111	)		(4,772	)

Cash interest paid, net of capitalized interest	$	1,418		$	2,897		$	10,511		$	9,288

Income tax refunds received were $1.5 million and $64.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 respectively.

11. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES:

In June 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. SFAS No. 141 supersedes APB Opinion No. 16, “Business Combinations” and requires the use of the purchase method of accounting for all business combinations prospectively. SFAS No. 141 also provides guidance on recognition of intangible assets apart from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 supersedes APB Opinion No. 17, “Intangible Assets”, and changes the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives will not be amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that these intangible assets may be impaired. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141 in June of 2001. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002, and as a result, the Company ceased the amortization of goodwill on that date.

The transitional provisions of SFAS No. 142 required the Company to perform an assessment of whether goodwill was impaired at the beginning of the fiscal year in which the statement is adopted. Under the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 142, the first step was for the Company to evaluate whether the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeded its fair value. If the reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test would be completed. During the second step, the Company compared the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting unit’s fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in accordance with SFAS No. 141, to its carrying amount.

The Company completed the transitional goodwill impairment reviews required by SFAS No. 142 during the second quarter of 2002. In performing the impairment reviews, the Company estimated the fair values of the reporting units using a present value method that discounted estimated future cash flows. Such valuations are sensitive to assumptions associated with cash flow growth, discount rates and capital rates. In performing the impairment reviews, the Company determined one reporting unit’s goodwill to be impaired. Based on the estimated fair value of the reporting unit, the Company impaired the recorded goodwill amount of $4.2 million associated with the Radisson Hotel at Opryland in the hospitality segment. The circumstances leading to the goodwill impairment assessment for the Radisson Hotel at Opryland primarily relate to the effect of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the hospitality and tourism industries. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company has reflected the impairment charge as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the amount of $2.6 million, net of tax benefit of $1.6 million, as of January 1, 2002 in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The Company performed the annual impairment review on all goodwill at December 31, 2002 and determined that no further impairment, other than the goodwill impairment of the Radisson Hotel at Opryland as discussed above, would be required during 2002.

During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2003, there were no changes to the carrying amounts of goodwill. The carrying amounts of goodwill are included in the Attractions and Opry Group at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002.

The Company also reassessed the useful lives and classification of identifiable finite-lived intangible assets upon adoption effective January 1, 2002, and determined the lives of these intangible assets to be appropriate. The carrying amount of amortized intangible assets in continuing operations, including the intangible assets related to benefit plans, was $2.4 million at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. The related accumulated amortization of intangible assets in continuing operations was $472,263 and $445,000 at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. The amortization expense related to intangibles from continuing operations during the three months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 was $10,203 and $14,463, respectively. The estimated amounts of amortization expense for the next five years are equivalent to $37,763 per year.

12. STOCK PLANS:

SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to account for employee stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method as prescribed in APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations, under which no compensation cost related to employee stock options has been recognized. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123”. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 to provide two additional methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. This statement also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require certain disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted the amended disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 on December 31, 2002, and the information contained in this report reflects the disclosure requirements of the new pronouncement. The Company will continue to account for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25.

If compensation cost for these plans had been determined consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended, the Company’s net income and income per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 would have been reduced to the following pro forma amounts:

(net income in thousands)
(per share data in dollars)


		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,

		2003		2002		2003		2002

Net income:
	As reported	$	10,743	$	100,044	$	15,640	$	97,775
	Stock-based employee compensation, net of tax		722		770		2,184		2,414

	Pro forma	$	10,021	$	99,274	$	13,456	$	95,361

Net income per share:
	As reported	$	0.32	$	2.96	$	0.46	$	2.89

	Pro forma	$	0.30	$	2.94	$	0.40	$	2.82

Net income per share assuming dilution:
	As reported	$	0.32	$	2.96	$	0.46	$	2.89

	Pro forma	$	0.30	$	2.94	$	0.40	$	2.82

At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, 3,338,650 and 3,241,037 shares, respectively, of the Company’s common stock were reserved for future issuance pursuant to the exercise of stock options under the stock option and incentive plan. Under the terms of this plan, stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the fair market value at the date of grant and generally expire ten years after the date of grant. Generally, stock options granted to non-employee directors are exercisable immediately, while options granted to employees are exercisable one to five years from the date of grant. The Company accounts for this plan under APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations, under which no compensation expense for employee and non-employee director stock options has been recognized.

The plan also provides for the award of restricted stock. At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, awards of restricted stock of 89,225 and 86,025 shares, respectively, of common stock were outstanding. The market value at the date of grant of these restricted shares was recorded as unearned compensation as a component of stockholders’ equity. Unearned compensation is amortized and expensed over the vesting period of the restricted stock.

Included in compensation for the third quarter of 2003 is $0.6 million related to the grant of 552,500 units under the Company’s Performance Accelerated Restricted Stock Unit Program which was implemented in the second quarter of 2003. At September 30, 2003, there was approximately $10.7 million in unearned deferred compensation related to restricted unit grants recorded as other stockholders’ equity in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

13. RETIREMENT PLANS AND RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN:

Effective December 31, 2001, the Company amended its retirement plans and its retirement savings plan. As a result of these amendments, the retirement cash balance benefit was frozen, and the policy related to future Company contributions to the retirement savings plan was changed. The Company recorded a pretax charge of $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2002 related to the write-off of unamortized prior service cost in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits”, and related interpretations, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company amended the eligibility requirements of its postretirement benefit plans effective December 31, 2001. In connection with the amendment and curtailment of the plans and in accordance with SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” and related interpretations, the Company recorded a gain of $2.1 million which is reflected as a reduction in corporate and other selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2002.

14. NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. SFAS No. 146 replaces Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 94-3. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred, whereas EITF No. 94-3 had recognized the liability at the commitment date to an exit plan. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 146 effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, and the adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN No. 45”). FIN No. 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by a guarantor in its financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Certain guarantee contracts are excluded from both the disclosure and recognition requirements of FIN No. 45, including, among others, residual value guarantees under capital lease arrangements and loan commitments. The disclosure requirements of FIN No. 45 were effective as of December 31, 2002. The recognition requirements of FIN No. 45 are to be applied prospectively to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No.46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No.51” (“FIN No. 46”). FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the equity investors in the entity do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. FIN No. 46 is effective for all new variable interest entities created or acquired after January 31, 2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN No. 46 must be applied for the first interim or annual period beginning after December 15, 2003. The Company is currently examining the impact FIN No. 46 will have on its future results of operations or financial position.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

the payments due under the Naming Rights Agreement by way of set off against obligations owed by Plaintiff to CCK Holdings, LLC (“CCK”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under a “put option” CCK exercised pursuant to the Partnership Agreement between CCK and Plaintiff. CCK has assigned the proceeds of its put option to the Company. Although the Company does not have any obligations to make additional capital contributions to the Limited Partnership under the Partnership Agreement, the Company (along with the other partners in the Limited Partnership) have executed a guarantee of certain of the Limited Partnership’s obligations to the National Hockey League. The Company is vigorously contesting this case by filing an answer and counterclaim denying any liability to Plaintiff, specifically alleging that all payments due to Plaintiff under the Naming Rights Agreement have been paid in full and asserting a counterclaim for amounts owing on the put option under the Partnership Agreement. The Company will continue to vigorously assert its rights in this litigation. Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment, and the parties are proceeding with discovery.

As previously disclosed in January 2003, the Company restated its historical financial statements for 2000, 2001 and the first nine months of 2002 to reflect certain non-cash changes, which resulted primarily from a change to the Company’s income tax accrual and the manner in which the Company accounted for its investment in the Nashville Predators. The Company has been advised by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) Staff that it is conducting a formal investigation into the financial results and transactions that were the subject of the restatement by the Company. The Company has been cooperating with the SEC staff and intends to continue to do so. Although the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of the investigation, the Company does not currently believe that the investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

16. RESORTQUEST ACQUISITION:

On August 4, 2003, the Company entered into a merger agreement to acquire ResortQuest International, Inc (“ResortQuest”), based in Destin, Florida and a leading provider of vacation rental property management services in premier resort locations. Under the terms of the definitive agreement, ResortQuest stockholders will receive 0.275 shares of Gaylord common stock for each outstanding share of ResortQuest common stock, and the Resort Quest option holders will receive 0.275 options to purchase Gaylord common stock for each outstanding option to purchase one share of ResortQuest common stock. ResortQuest will continue to operate as a separate brand. ResortQuest will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and ResortQuest stockholders will own approximately 14% of the outstanding shares of the Company, on a fully diluted basis, after the merger. The acquisition is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2003, and is subject to approval by the respective stockholders of both the Company and ResortQuest and certain other customary conditions.

As part of this transaction and during the period prior to closing, the Company agreed to provide ResortQuest, subject to the approval of ResortQuest’s lenders and certain other customary conditions, a line of credit of up to $10.0 million. The Company also provided an unconditional and irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $5.0 million to ResortQuest’s former credit card processor on behalf of ResortQuest. Any amounts drawn on the letter of credit by the processor are automatically deemed advances under the line of credit between the Company and ResortQuest, and are thereby automatically owed by ResortQuest to the Company under that agreement. As a result, amounts owed to the Company by ResortQuest under the line of credit may be as much as $15.0 million, $10.0 million under the terms of the line of credit and an additional $5.0 million as a result of draws on the letter of credit. As of September 30, 2003, were no amounts outstanding under the Company’s line of credit to ResortQuest.

consummation of the merger through the use of proceeds from the offering of the Senior Notes, as described in Note 5, and cash on hand. As of September 30, 2003, ResortQuest’s indebtedness was $33.9 million under its credit facility and $50 million under its senior notes.

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

Senior Notes Offering, Amendment to 2003 Loans and New Revolving Credit Facility

On November 12, 2003, the Company completed its offering of $350 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes, as more fully described in Note 5. The proceeds of the Senior Notes have been used for the repayment of certain indebtedness of the Company while the remaining proceeds are expected to be used to repay certain indebtedness of ResortQuest. In connection with the offering of the Senior Notes, the Company has amended the provisions of the 2003 Loans. In addition, the Company has received a commitment from certain of its bank lenders under the 2003 Loans to provide a $65.0 million revolving credit facility to replace the Company’s existing $25.0 million revolving credit facility following the issuance of the Senior Notes and repayment of amounts outstanding under the 2003 Loans.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Subsequent to September 30, 2003, and in conjunction with the Company’s offering of $350 million 8% Senior Notes due 2013, the Company terminated its variable to fixed interest rate swaps with an original notional value of $200 million related to the senior term loan and the subordinated term loan portions of the 2003 Loans which were repaid, resulting in a net benefit aggregating approximately $242,000. The Company has also entered into a new interest rate swap with respect to $125 million aggregate principal amount of its $350 million 8% Senior Notes due 2013. This interest rate swap, which has a term of ten years, effectively adjusts the interest rate of that portion of the Senior Notes to LIBOR plus 2.95%. The interest rate swap and the Senior Notes are deemed effective and therefore the hedge is expected to qualify as an effective Fair Value Hedge under SFAS No. 133.

ResortQuest

On November 5, 2003, ResortQuest executed a draw of $2.5 million on the $10.0 million line of credit extended by the Company, as provided for by the merger agreement as discussed in Note 16.

18. FINANCIAL REPORTING BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS:

The Company’s continuing operations are organized and managed based upon its products and services. The Company revised its reportable segments during the first quarter of 2003 due to the Company’s decision to dispose of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM). Prior year information has been revised in accordance with SFAS No. 131,“Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” to conform to the 2003 presentation. The following information from continuing operations is derived directly from the segments’ internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes.


(in thousands)			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			September 30,						September 30,

			2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenues:
	Hospitality		$	82,797		$	85,066		$	272,502		$	245,834
	Attractions and Opry Group			15,259			15,323			45,310			50,037
	Corporate and other			45			32			139			144

		Total	$	98,101		$	100,421		$	317,951		$	296,015

Depreciation and amortization:
	Hospitality		$	11,833		$	11,219		$	34,991		$	33,547
	Attractions and Opry Group			1,215			1,265			3,851			4,095
	Corporate and other			1,519			1,449			4,602			4,283

		Total	$	14,567		$	13,933		$	43,444		$	41,925

Operating income (loss):
	Hospitality		$	5,248		$	8,523		$	34,687		$	18,018
	Attractions and Opry Group			825			1,447			(610	)		2,400
	Corporate and other			(10,654	)		(9,755	)		(31,379	)		(31,535	)
	Preopening costs			(3,316	)		(1,883	)		(7,176	)		(7,990	)
	Gain on sale of assets			—			19,962			—			30,529
	Restructuring charges, net			—			—			—			(50	)

		Total	$	(7,897	)	$	18,294		$	(4,478	)	$	11,372

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company revised its reportable segments during the first quarter of 2003 primarily due to the Company’s decision to dispose of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM). Prior year information has been revised in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” to conform to the 2003 presentation. The Company is a diversified hospitality and entertainment company operating, through its subsidiaries, principally in three business segments: Hospitality; Attractions and Opry Group; and Corporate and Other. The Company is managed using the three business segments described above.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the preparation of the consolidated financial statements and the financial reporting process and are based upon current judgments. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their complexity and the possibility that future events affecting them may differ materially from the Company’s current judgments and estimates.

This listing of critical accounting policies is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of the Company’s accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for management’s judgment regarding the accounting policy. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue from its rooms as earned on the close of business each day. Revenues from concessions and food and beverage sales are recognized at the time of the sale. The Company recognizes revenues from the Attractions and Opry Group segment when services are provided or goods are shipped, as applicable. Provision for returns and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the revenues are recognized. The Company defers revenues related to deposits on advance room bookings and advance ticket sales at the Company’s tourism properties until such amounts are earned.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

In accounting for the Company’s long-lived assets other than goodwill, the Company applies the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. The Company previously accounted for goodwill using SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of.” The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 144 during 2001 with an effective date of January 1, 2001. In June 2001, SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” was issued. SFAS No. 142 was effective January 1, 2002. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized but will be tested for impairment at least annually and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that these intangibles may be impaired. The determination and measurement of an impairment loss under these accounting standards require the significant use of judgment and estimates. The

determination of fair value of these assets and the timing of an impairment charge are two critical components of recognizing an asset impairment charge that are subject to the significant use of judgment and estimation. Future events may indicate differences from these judgments and estimates.

Restructuring Charges

Historically, the Company has recognized restructuring charges in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” in its consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2003 all future restructuring charges will be recorded in accordance with SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. Restructuring charges are based upon certain estimates of liabilities related to costs to exit an activity. Liability estimates may change as a result of future events, including negotiation of reductions in contract termination liabilities and expiration of outplacement agreements.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company utilizes derivative financial instruments to reduce interest rate risks and to manage risk exposure to changes in the value of certain owned marketable securities. The Company records derivatives in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which was subsequently amended by SFAS No. 138. SFAS No. 133, as amended, established accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires all derivatives to be recognized in the statement of financial position and to be measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of those instruments will be reported in earnings or other comprehensive income depending on the use of the derivative and whether it qualifies for hedge accounting. The measurement of the derivative’s fair value requires the use of estimates and assumptions. Changes in these estimates or assumptions could materially impact the determination of the fair value of the derivatives.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

Senior Notes Offering, Amendment to 2003 Loans and New Revolving Credit Facility

On November 12, 2003, the Company completed its offering of $350 million in aggregate principal amount of Senior Notes, as more fully described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources”. The proceeds of the Senior Notes have been used for the repayment of certain indebtedness of the Company while the remaining proceeds are expected to be used to repay certain indebtedness of ResortQuest. In connection with the offering of the Senior Notes, the Company has amended the provisions of the 2003 Loans. In addition, the Company has received a commitment from certain of its bank lenders under the 2003 Loans to provide a $65.0 million revolving credit facility to replace the Company’s existing $25.0 million revolving credit facility following the issuance of the Senior Notes and repayment of amounts outstanding under the 2003 Loans.

ResortQuest Acquisition

This line of credit, which bears interest at 10.5% per annum, is unsecured and subordinated to ResortQuest’s existing debt and will be used by ResortQuest for general working capital purposes. In addition, pursuant to the merger agreement, the merger is conditioned on the payment of ResortQuest’s indebtedness under its credit facility. ResortQuest was also required, as a result of entering into the merger agreement, to offer to repurchase its senior notes. Accordingly, the Company expects to retire the indebtedness of ResortQuest under its credit facility and senior notes in connection with consummation of the merger through the use of proceeds from the offering of the Senior Notes and cash on hand.

Litigation

The Company is currently party to a lawsuit relating to its investment in the Nashville Predators NHL franchise and its related obligations under a Naming Rights Agreement for the Gaylord Entertainment Center in Nashville, Tennessee. A description of this litigation and its current status is located in “Part II. Other Information — Item 1. Legal Proceedings” of this report.

SEC Investigation

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table contains unaudited summary financial data for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. The table also shows the percentage relationships to total revenues and, in the case of segment operating income (loss), its relationship to segment revenues.


(in thousands)				Three Months Ended											Nine Months Ended
				September 30,											September 30,

				2003			%			2002			%		2003			%			2002			%

Revenues:
	Hospitality			$	82,797			84.4		$	85,066			84.7	$	272,502			85.7		$	245,834			83.0
	Attractions and Opry group				15,259			15.6			15,323			15.3		45,310			14.3			50,037			16.9
	Corporate and other				45			—			32			—		139			—			144			—

		Total revenues			98,101			100.0			100,421			100.0		317,951			100.0			296,015			100.0

Operating expenses:
	Operating costs				63,527			64.8			59,380			59.1		191,933			60.4			188,888			63.8
	Selling, general & administrative				24,621			25.1			26,909			26.8		79,941			25.1			76,363			25.8
	Preopening costs				3,283			3.3			1,867			1.9		7,111			2.2			7,946			2.7
	Gain on sale of assets				—			—			(19,962	)		—		—			—			(30,529	)		—
	Restructuring charge, net				—			—			—			—		—			—			50			—
	Depreciation and amortization:
		Hospitality			11,833						11,219					34,991						33,547
		Attractions and Opry group			1,215						1,265					3,851						4,095
		Corporate and other			1,519						1,449					4,602						4,283

		Total depreciation and amortization			14,567			14.9			13,933			13.9		43,444			13.7			41,925			14.2

			Total operating expenses		105,998			108.0			82,127			81.8		322,429			101.4			284,643			96.2

Operating income (loss):
	Hospitality				5,248			6.3			8,523			10.0		34,687			12.7			18,018			7.3
	Attractions and Opry group				825			5.4			1,447			9.4		(610	)		(1.3	)		2,400			4.8
	Corporate and other				(10,654	)		—			(9,755	)		—		(31,379	)		—			(31,535	)		—
	Preopening costs				(3,316	)		—			(1,883	)		—		(7,176	)		—			(7,990	)		—
	Gain on sale of assets				—			—			19,962			—		—			—			30,529			—
	Restructuring charge, net				—			—			—			—		—			—			(50	)		—

		Total operating income (loss)			(7,897	)		(8.0	)		18,294			18.2		(4,478	)		(1.4	)		11,372			3.8
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized					(10,476	)		—			(11,939	)		—		(31,139	)		—			(36,289	)		—
Interest income					742			—			840			—		1,773			—			1,917			—
Gain (loss) on Viacom stock and derivatives, net					(26,000	)		—			18,635			—		(3,051	)		—			41,194			—
Other gains and (losses), net					152			—			787			—		435			—			665			—
(Provision) benefit for income taxes					19,072			—			(7,283	)		—		15,974			—			(1,605	)		—
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes					35,150			—			80,710			—		36,126			—			83,093			—
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of taxes					—			—			—			—		—			—			(2,572	)		—

Net income				$	10,743			—		$	100,044			—	$	15,640			—		$	97,775			—

PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 COMPARED TO PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2002

Hospitality

The Hospitality segment comprises the operations of the Gaylord Hotel properties and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland. The Gaylord Hotel properties consist of the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center located in Nashville, Tennessee (“Gaylord Opryland”) and the Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center located in Kissimmee, Florida (“Gaylord Palms”).

The Company considers Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) to be a meaningful indicator of our hospitality segment performance because it measures the period over period change in room revenues. The Company calculates RevPAR by dividing room sales by room nights available to guests for the period. RevPAR is not comparable to similarly titled measures such as revenues. Occupancy, Average Daily Rate and RevPAR for Gaylord Opryland and Gaylord Palms, subsequent to its January 2002 opening, are shown in the following table.


		For the Three Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
		September 30,						September 30,

		2003			2002			2003			2002

Gaylord Opryland Occupancy			70.7	%		68.7	%		72.2	%		67.0	%
	Average Daily Rate	$	132.25		$	140.78		$	135.16		$	140.09
	RevPAR	$	93.46		$	96.71		$	97.64		$	93.83
Gaylord Palms Occupancy			70.0	%		68.6	%		76.2	%		68.2	%
	Average Daily Rate	$	147.17		$	155.54		$	169.57		$	170.66
	RevPAR	$	103.00		$	106.72		$	129.28		$	116.41

Total revenues in the Hospitality segment decreased $2.3 million, or 2.7%, to $82.8 million in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002, and increased $26.7 million, or 10.8%, to $272.5 million in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. Revenues of Gaylord Palms decreased $3.1 million, or 9.0%, to $31.5 million in the third quarter of 2003, and increased $15.6 million, or 15.6%, to $115.8 million for the first nine months of 2003. Revenues of Gaylord Opryland increased $0.8 million, or 1.5%, to $49.4 million in the third quarter of 2003 and increased $10.8 million, or 7.7%, to $151.5 million in the first nine months of 2003.

Revenues decreased at Gaylord Palms for the three months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002, due to a reduction in group rooms occupied due to accommodations to groups needing to move their meetings from third quarter 2003 to 2004. The increase in revenues at Gaylord Palms for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002, is attributed to higher levels of occupancy at the hotel during the period and higher RevPAR during the period. This higher level of occupancy can be attributed to lower than anticipated results in 2002 due to the effects of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, as well as the fact that the hotel was in operation for the full nine months of 2003. Management also believes this higher level of occupancy can also be attributed to higher customer satisfaction at the hotel, resulting in increases in return and first-time group and individual bookings.

The increase in revenues at Gaylord Opryland for the three months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2002, was driven by higher occupancy at the hotel. While occupancy increased, lower group room rates and an unfavorable change in group customer mix during the period contributed to a reduction in average daily rate and RevPAR during this period. The increase in revenues at Gaylord Opryland for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002, is primarily attributed to increased occupancy during the period.

Total operating expenses, which consists of operating costs and selling, general and administrative expenses, in the Hospitality segment increased $0.4 million, or 0.6%, to $65.7 million in the third quarter of 2003, and increased $8.6 million, or 4.4%, to $202.9 million in the first nine months of 2003. For the third quarter of 2003, Gaylord Palms’ total operating expenses decreased $0.4 million, or 1.5%, to $26.8 million and Gaylord Opryland’s total operating expenses increased $0.6 million, or 1.6%, to $37.6 million. For the first nine months of 2003, Gaylord Palms’ total operating expenses increased $6.3 million, or 8.0%, to $85.2 million and Gaylord Opryland’s total operating expenses increased $2.0 million, or 1.8%, to $113.8 million.

Operating costs consists of direct costs associated with the daily operations of the Company’s businesses. Operating costs in the Hospitality segment increased $2.7 million, or 5.5%, to $51.5 million for the third quarter of 2003, and increased $6.8 million, or 4.5%, to $157.2 million in the first nine months of 2003. Operating costs at Gaylord Palms increased $0.7 million, to $19.4 million for the third quarter of 2003, and increased $3.8 million, to $61.6 million, for the first nine months of 2003. Operating costs at Gaylord Opryland increased $1.8 million to $31.0 million in the third quarter of 2003, and increased $2.8 million, to $92.9 million, for the first nine months of 2003. The increase at Gaylord Palms for the three months ended September 30, 2003 was due to the increased level of occupancy at the hotel, while the increase at Gaylord Palms for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was primarily attributed to the fact that the hotel was open for the full nine months of 2003. The increase in operating costs at Gaylord Opryland for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was due to an increase in utilities expense, as well as higher costs resulting from increased occupancy at the hotel.

Selling, general and administrative expenses in the hospitality segment decreased $2.3 million, or 13.7%, to $14.3 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the same period ended 2002, and increased $1.8 million, or 4.0%, to $45.6 million for the first nine months of 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses at Gaylord Palms decreased $1.1 million, to $7.3 million, for the third quarter of 2003, and increased $2.5 million to $23.6 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses at Gaylord Palms for the three months ending September 30, 2003 is due to a reduction in advertising expenditures and raw materials and supplies. This reduction can be attributed to a higher level of expenditures in 2002 associated with the hotel’s continued “start-up” operations in the third quarter of 2002. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses at Gaylord Palms for the nine month period ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2002, is primarily attributable to the fact that the hotel was in operation for the full nine months of 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses at Gaylord Opryland decreased $1.2 million, to $6.6 million for the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $0.8 million, to $21.0 million, for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 for Gaylord Opryland is due to a decrease in advertising expense related to a reduction in special event advertising and a decrease in direct mail advertising.

Attractions and Opry Group

The Attractions and Opry Group consists of the Grand Ole Opry, WSM-AM, the Ryman Auditorium, the Wildhorse Saloon, the General Jackson Showboat, the Springhouse Golf Course and Corporate Magic, a company specializing in the production of creative and entertainment events in support of the corporate and meeting marketplace.

Revenues in the Attractions and Opry Group segment were flat at $15.3 million for the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002, and decreased $4.7 million, or 9.4%, to $45.3 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease in revenues in the Attractions and Opry Group is primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease at Corporate Magic due to decreased corporate customer spending during the first nine months of 2003, as compared to the same period of 2002. The decrease in revenue of Corporate Magic was partially offset by increased revenues of the Grand Ole Opry and the Wildhorse Saloon during the first nine months of 2003 due to a slightly better tourism market during 2003 as compared to 2002.

Total operating expenses in the Attractions and Opry Group segment increased $0.6 million, or 4.8%, to $13.2 million in the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $1.5 million, or 3.4%, to $42.1 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease in total operating expense for the nine months of 2003 is primarily due to the decrease in operating expenses associated with Corporate Magic’s decrease in revenue.

Operating costs of the Attractions and Opry Group segment increased $1.3 million, or 15.2%, to $10.1 million for the third quarter of 2003, as compared to the third quarter of 2002, and decreased $4.7 million, or 14.1%, to $28.7 million for the first nine months of 2003, compared to the same period of 2002. The increase in operating costs for the third quarter is primarily attributed to increased labor costs and corporate shared services allocations. The operating costs decrease for the nine months ending September 30, 2003, is due to a decrease in the operating costs of Corporate Magic of $3.4 million, to $6.3 million for the first nine months of 2003, as compared to same period of 2002, as a result of a decrease in Corporate Magic revenue.

During 2000, the Company began production of an IMAX movie to portray the history of country music. As a result of the 2001 Strategic Assessment, the carrying value of the IMAX film asset was reevaluated on the basis of its estimated future cash flows resulting in an initial impairment charge of $6.9 million.

In the third quarter of 2003, based on the revenues generated by the theatrical release of the movie, the asset was again reevaluated on the basis of estimated future cash flows. As a result, an additional impairment charge of $0.9 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2003. The carrying value of the asset was $1.2 million, as of September 30, 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses of the Attractions and Opry Group decreased $0.7 million to $3.2 million for the third quarter of 2003, as compared to the third quarter of 2002, and increased $3.3 million, to $13.4 million for the first nine months of 2003. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses during the first nine months of 2003 is primarily due to the increase in certain profit sharing and bonus plan expenses.

Corporate and Other

Corporate and Other segment consists of the naming rights agreement, salaries and benefits, legal, human resources, accounting, pension and other administrative costs. Total operating expenses in the Corporate and Other segment increased $0.8 million, or 10.1%, to $9.2 million during the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $0.5 million, or 1.8%, to $27.0 million for the first nine months of 2003. Effective December 31, 2001, the Company amended its retirement plans and its retirement savings plan. As a result of these amendments, the retirement cash balance benefit was frozen and the policy related to future Company contributions to the retirement savings plan was changed. The Company recorded a pretax charge of $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2002 related to the write-off of unamortized prior service cost in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits”, and related interpretations, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company amended the eligibility requirements of its postretirement benefit plans effective December 31, 2001. In connection with the amendment and curtailment of the plans and in accordance with SFAS No.

106, “Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions” and related interpretations, the Company recorded a gain of $2.1 million which is reflected as a reduction in corporate and other selling, general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2002. The change in operating costs associated with the change in pension plans was a net increase of selling, general and administrative costs in 2002 of $3.3 million. These nonrecurring gains and losses were recorded in the Corporate and Other segment and were not allocated to the Company’s other operating segments.

Preopening Costs

Preopening costs are costs related to the Company’s hotel development activities. Preopening costs increased $1.4 million, to $3.3 million for the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $0.8 million, to $7.1 million for the first nine months of 2003. The changes in the preopening costs are attributed to the opening of Gaylord Palms in January 2002, and the increased activity in preparing the Gaylord hotel in Texas expected to open in April 2004. Preopening costs for the three months and nine months ended September 30 are as follows:


(in thousands)		Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,

		2003		2002		2003		2002

Gaylord Palms		$	—	$	41	$	—	$	4,846
Texas Hotel			3,257		1,438		6,928		2,712
Other preopening			26		388		183		388

	Total preopening costs	$	3,283	$	1,867	$	7,111	$	7,946

The Company expects preopening costs to increase during the remainder of 2003 as a result of the Gaylord hotel in Texas. The Company anticipates preopening costs associated with the Gaylord hotel in Texas to total approximately $12.6 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2003.

Gain on Sale of Assets

Restructuring Charges

As part of the Company’s ongoing assessment of operations during 2002, the Company identified certain duplication of duties within divisions and realized the need to streamline those tasks and duties. Related to this assessment, during the second quarter of 2002 the Company adopted a plan of restructuring to streamline certain operations and duties. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pretax restructuring charge of $1.1 million related to employee severance costs and other employee benefits. The restructuring charges all relate to continuing operations. The 2002 restructuring charge was partially offset by reversal of prior years’ restructuring accrual of $1.1 million, as discussed below.

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company reversed $0.9 million of the 2001 restructuring charges related to continuing operations. The reversal included charges related to a lease commitment and certain placement costs related to the 2001 and 2000 restructuring. During the second quarter of 2002, the Company entered into two subleases to lease certain office space the Company previously had recorded in the 2001 and 2000 restructuring charges. The sublease agreements resulted in a reversal of the 2001 and 2000 restructuring charges in the amount of $0.7 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Also during the second quarter of 2002, the Company evaluated the 2001 restructuring accrual and determined certain severance benefits and outplacement services had expired.

During the fourth quarter of 2000, the Company recognized pretax restructuring charges of $16.4 million related to exiting certain lines of business and implementing a new strategic plan. The restructuring charges consisted of contract termination costs of $10.0 million to exit specific activities and employee severance and related costs of $6.4 million. During the second quarter of 2001, the Company negotiated reductions in certain contract termination costs, which allowed the reversal of $2.3 million of the restructuring charges originally recorded during the fourth quarter of 2000.

Depreciation Expense

Depreciation expense was $13.2 million for the third quarter and $39.7 million for the first nine months of 2003 and remained relatively constant compared to the same periods of 2002, due to the same amount of depreciable assets in service during the periods.

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense increased $0.4 million for the third quarter and $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, as compared to the same periods of 2002. The increase in amortization expense is due to additional amortization of software during the periods.

Consolidated Operating Income (Loss)

Total operating income decreased $26.2 million to an operating loss of $7.9 million in the third quarter of 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002, and decreased $15.9 million, to a $4.5 million operating loss in the first nine months of 2003, as compared to the same period of 2002. This decrease is primarily attributed to a gain of $20.0 million representing the estimated fair value of the continuing land lease interest between the Company and the Opry Mills partnership at June 30, 2002, that was recognized in the operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Operating income in the hospitality segment decreased $4.7 million during the third quarter of 2003, and increased $17.5 million for the first nine months of 2003. The decrease for the three months ended September 30, 2003 is attributed to lower RevPAR. The increase for the first nine months of 2003 is primarily as a result of the Gaylord Palms being open for a full nine months in 2003. Operating income of the Attractions and Opry Group segment decreased $0.6 million to $0.8 million for the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $3.0 million, to an operating loss of $0.6 million for the first nine months of 2003. The operating income of the Attractions and Opry Group segment decreased as a result of decreased operating income of Corporate Magic of $1.0 million due to decreased corporate customer spending and a reduction in events for the first nine months of 2003 as compared to 2002.

The Corporate and Other segment realized an operating loss of $10.7 million for the third quarter of 2003 compared to an operating income of $10.2 million for the same period a year earlier. The decrease of $20.9 million is primarily attributed to a gain of $20.0 million representing the estimated fair value of the continuing land lease interest between the Company and the Opry Mills partnership at June 30, 2002, that was recognized in the operating results for the third quarter of 2002. The change is due to increased personnel costs, changes in the Company’s medical plans and the Company’s amendment of its retirement plans, retirement savings plan and postretirement benefits plans.

Consolidated Interest Expense

Consolidated interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreased $1.5 million to $10.5 million for the third quarter of 2003 and decreased $5.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The decrease in 2003 was caused by an increase in capitalized interest of $5.7 million primarily related to the increase in capitalized interest of the Gaylord hotel in Texas during the first nine months of 2003. The increase in capitalized interest was partially offset by the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs of the Term Loan at the time the Term Loan was paid off in May 2003. The Company’s weighted average interest rate on its borrowings, including the interest expense related to the secured forward exchange contract, was 5.2% in the first nine months of 2003 as compared to 5.3% in the first nine months of 2002.

Consolidated Interest Income

Interest income remained relatively constant at $0.7 million for the third quarter of 2003, and $1.8 million for the first nine months of 2003.

Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Viacom Stock and Derivatives

During 2000, the Company entered into a seven-year secured forward exchange contract with respect to 10.9 million shares of Viacom Class B Common Stock (the “Viacom Stock”). Effective January 1, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended, and reclassified its investment in Viacom Stock from available-for-sale to trading. Under SFAS No. 133, components of the secured forward exchange contract are considered derivatives.

For the three months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded net pretax losses of $59.0 million related to the decrease in fair value of the Viacom Stock and a pretax gain of $33.0 million related to the increase in fair value of the derivatives associated with the secured forward exchange contract. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the Company recorded a pretax loss of $27.1 million related to the decrease in fair value of the Viacom Stock and pretax gains of $24.0 million related to the increase in fair value of the derivatives associated with the secured forward exchange contract.

For the three months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded net pretax losses of $42.0 million related to the decrease in fair value of the Viacom Stock and a pretax gain of $60.7 million related to the increase in fair value of the derivatives associated with the secured forward exchange contract. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, the Company recorded a pretax loss of $39.6 million related to the decrease in fair value of the Viacom Stock and pretax gains of $80.8 million related to the increase in fair value of the derivatives associated with the secured forward exchange contract.

Consolidated Other Gains and Losses

Other gains and losses decreased $0.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the same period in 2002 and decreased $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

Consolidated Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes decreased $26.4 million to a $19.1 million benefit in the third quarter of 2003, and decreased $17.6 million to a $16.0 million benefit for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The effective tax rate for income taxes was 43.87% for the first nine months of 2003 compared to 8.51% for the first nine months of 2002.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

WSM-FM and WWTN(FM)
During the first quarter of 2003, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM) (collectively, the “Radio operations”). Subsequent to committing to a plan of disposal during the first quarter, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an agreement to sell the assets primarily used in the operations of WSM-FM and WWTN(FM) to Cumulus Broadcasting, Inc. (“Cumulus”) in exchange for approximately $62.5 million in cash. In connection with this agreement, the Company also entered into a local marketing agreement with Cumulus pursuant to which, from April 21, 2003 until the closing of the sale of the assets, the Company, for a fee, made available to Cumulus substantially all of the broadcast time on WSM-FM and WWTN(FM). In turn, Cumulus provided programming to be broadcast during such broadcast time and collected revenues from the advertising that it sold for broadcast during this programming time. On July 21, 2003, the Company finalized the sale of WSM-FM and

WWTN(FM) for approximately $62.5 million and recorded a pretax gain on the sale during the third quarter of 2003 of approximately $54.6 million. At the time of the sale, net proceeds of approximately $50 million were placed in restricted cash for completion of the Gaylord hotel in Texas. Concurrently, the Company also entered into a joint sales agreement with Cumulus for WSM-AM in exchange for $2.5 million in cash. The Company will continue to own and operate WSM-AM, and under the terms of the joint sales agreement with Cumulus, Cumulus will be responsible for all sales of commercial advertising on WSM-AM and provide certain sales promotion, billing and collection services relating to WSM-AM, all for a specified commission. The joint sales agreement has a term of five years.

Acuff-Rose Music Publishing

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company committed to a plan of disposal of its Acuff-Rose Music Publishing catalog entity. During the third quarter of 2002, the Company finalized the sale of the Acuff-Rose Music Publishing catalog entity to Sony/ATV Music Publishing for approximately $157.0 million in cash before royalties payable to Sony for the period beginning July 1, 2002 until the sale date. Proceeds of $25.0 million were used to reduce the Company’s outstanding indebtedness as further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing”. During the third quarter of 2003, the Company revised its estimates of reserves previously established for certain sale-related, transaction costs resulting in a reduction in the reserve amount of $0.5 million.

OKC Redhawks

Word Entertainment

The Company committed to a plan to sell Word during the third quarter of 2001. During January 2002, the Company sold Word’s domestic operations to an affiliate of Warner Music Group for $84.1 million in cash. The Company recognized a pretax gain of $0.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2002 related to the sale in discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Proceeds from the sale of $80.0 million were used to reduce the Company’s outstanding indebtedness as further described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Financing”. During the third quarter of 2003, due to the expiration of certain indemnification periods as specified in the sales contract, the previously established indemnification reserve of $1.5 million was reversed.

International Cable Networks

On June 1, 2001, the Company adopted a formal plan to dispose of its international cable networks. During the first quarter of 2002, the Company finalized a transaction to sell certain assets of its Asia and Brazil networks. The terms of this transaction included the assignment of certain transponder leases, which resulted in a reduction of the Company’s transponder lease liability and a related $3.8 million pretax gain, during the first quarter of 2002, which is reflected in discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The Company guaranteed $0.9 million in future lease payments by the assignee from the date of the sale until December 31, 2002. At the time the Company entered into the guarantee, the Company recorded the associated liability of $0.9 million. Due to the assignee’s failure to pay the lease liability during the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company was required to pay the lease payments. The Company is not required to pay any future lease payments related to the transponder lease. In addition, the Company ceased its operations based in Argentina during 2002.

The following table reflects the results of operations of businesses accounted for as discontinued operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30:


(in thousands)			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			September 30,						September 30,

			2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenues:
	Radio operations		$	360		$	2,764		$	3,703		$	7,344
	Acuff-Rose Music Publishing			—			—			—			7,654
	Redhawks			2,137			2,557			5,000			6,048
	Word			—			—			—			2,594
	International cable networks			—			—			—			744

		Total revenues of discontinued operations	$	2,497		$	5,321		$	8,703		$	24,384

Operating income (loss):
	Radio operations		$	89		$	741		$	613		$	661
	Acuff-Rose Music Publishing			—			(460	)		—			933
	Redhawks			497			711			529			974
	Word			—			(11	)		—			(917	)
	International cable networks			—			—			—			(1,576	)

		Total operating income of discontinued operations		586			981			1,142			75
Interest expense				(1	)		—			(1	)		(80	)
Interest income				2			11			7			61
Other gains and losses				56,885			130,790			57,239			135,393

Income before provision for income taxes				57,472			131,782			58,387			135,449
Provision for income taxes				22,322			51,072			22,261			52,356

Income from discontinued operations			$	35,150		$	80,710		$	36,126		$	83,093

The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operations presented in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are comprised of:


(in thousands)				September 30,		December 31,
				2003		2002

Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	1,919	$	1,812
	Trade receivables, less allowance of $0 and $490, respectively				112		1,600
	Inventories				154		163
	Prepaid expenses				—		127
	Other current assets				—		393

		Total current assets			2,185		4,095
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation					3,256		5,157
Goodwill					—		3,527
Amortizable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization					3,942		3,942
Other long-term assets					1,200		702

		Total long-term assets			8,398		13,328

			Total assets	$	10,583	$	17,423

Current liabilities:
	Current portion of long-term debt			$	—	$	94
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses				3,167		6,558

		Total current liabilities			3,167		6,652
Other long-term liabilities					828		789

		Total long-term liabilities			828		789

		Total liabilities			3,995		7,441

	Minority interest of discontinued operations				2,019		1,885

		Total liabilities and minority interest of discontinued operations		$	6,014	$	9,326

Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change

During the second quarter of 2002, the Company completed its transitional goodwill impairment test as required by SFAS No. 142. In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company has reflected the pretax $4.2 million impairment charge as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle in the amount of $2.6 million, net of tax benefit of $1.6 million, as of January 1, 2002 in the consolidated statements of operations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

Net cash flows provided by operating activities totaled $47.0 million and $63.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease in the total provided by operating activities was primarily related to a significant income tax refund received in 2002. Net cash flows from investing activities was a net use of $110.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, and was a net source of $157.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The decrease was primarily attributed to the sale of Word during the first quarter of 2002 and increased levels of capital spending related to the Gaylord hotel in Texas. The decrease in investing activities was also attributed to the sale of the Company’s Opry Mills investment during 2002. Net cash flows from financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was a use of $10.3 million compared to a use of $63.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. The change in financing activities was primarily due to the Company’s 2003 Loans as discussed below.

Indebtedness

2003 Loans

Term Loan

During the first three months of 2002, the Company sold Word’s domestic operations, which required a prepayment on the Term Loan in the amount of $80.0 million. As required by the Term Loan, the Company used $15.9 million of the net cash proceeds, as defined under the Term Loan agreement, received from the 2002 sale of the Opry Mills investment to

reduce the outstanding balance of the Term Loan. In addition, the Company used $25.0 million of the net cash proceeds, as defined under the Term Loan agreement, received from the 2002 sale of Acuff-Rose Music Publishing to further reduce the outstanding balance of the Term Loan. Excluding the payoff amount of $60 million discussed above, the Company made principal payments of approximately $0 and $4.1 million during 2003 and 2002, respectively, under the Term Loan. Net borrowings under the Term Loan for 2003 and 2002 were $0 and $85.0 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $0 million and $60 million, respectively, under the Term Loan.

The terms of the Term Loan required the Company to purchase an interest rate instrument which capped the interest rate paid by the Company. This instrument expired in the fourth quarter of 2002. Due to the expiration of the interest rate instrument, the Company was out of compliance with the terms of the Term Loan. Subsequent to December 31, 2002, the Company obtained a waiver from the lenders whereby this event of non-compliance was waived as of December 31, 2002 and also removed the requirement to maintain such instruments for the remaining term of the Term Loan.

Senior Loan and Mezzanine Loan

In 2001, the Company, through wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into two loan agreements, a $275.0 million senior loan (the “Senior Loan”) and a $100.0 million mezzanine loan (the “Mezzanine Loan”) (collectively, the “Nashville Hotel Loans”) with affiliates of Merrill Lynch & Company acting as principal. The Senior Loan is secured by a first mortgage lien on the assets of Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center (“Gaylord Opryland”) and is due in March 2004. Amounts outstanding under the Senior Loan bear interest at one-month LIBOR plus approximately 1.02%. The Mezzanine Loan, secured by the equity interest in the wholly-owned subsidiary that owns Gaylord Opryland, is due in April 2004 and bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus 6.0%. At the Company’s option, the Senior and Mezzanine Loans may be extended for two additional one-year terms beyond their scheduled maturities, subject to Gaylord Opryland meeting certain financial ratios and other criteria. The Company currently anticipates meeting the financial ratios and other criteria and exercising the option to extend the Senior Loan. However, based on the Company’s projections and estimates at September 30, 2003, the Company did not anticipate meeting the financial ratios to extend the Mezzanine Loan. As described below, the Company expects to refinance the Mezzanine Loan in connection with the offering of Senior Notes. Therefore, the Company has recorded the outstanding balance of the Mezzanine Loan of $66 million as current portion of long-term debt in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2003. The Nashville Hotel Loans require monthly principal payments of $0.7 million during their three-year terms in addition to monthly interest payments. The terms of the Senior Loan and the Mezzanine Loan required the Company to purchase interest rate hedges in notional amounts equal to the outstanding balances of the Senior Loan and the Mezzanine Loan in order to protect against adverse changes in one-month LIBOR. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company had purchased instruments that cap its exposure to one-month LIBOR at 7.5% as discussed in Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”. The Company used $235.0 million of the proceeds from the Nashville Hotel Loans to refinance the remaining outstanding portion of an interim loan obtained from Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital, Inc. in 2000 (the “Interim Loan”). At closing, the Company was required to escrow certain amounts, including $20.0 million related to future renovations and related capital expenditures at Gaylord Opryland. The net proceeds from the Nashville Hotel Loans after refinancing of the Interim Loan and paying required escrows and fees were approximately $97.6 million. At September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the unamortized balance of the deferred financing costs related to the Nashville Hotel Loans was $2.8 million and $7.3 million, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for the Senior Loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, including amortization of deferred financing costs, were 4.3% and 4.5%, respectively. The weighted average interest rates for the Mezzanine Loan for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, including amortization of deferred financing costs, were 10.7% and 10.3%, respectively.

Completion of Senior Notes Offering

On November 12, 2003, the Company completed its offering of $350 million in aggregate principal amount of senior notes due 2013 (the “Senior Notes”) in an institutional private placement, increased from the $225 million proposed offering previously announced. The interest rate of the Senior Notes is 8%, although the Company has entered into interest rate swaps with respect to $125 million principal amount of the Senior Notes which results in an effective interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.95% with respect to that portion of the Senior Notes as described in “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” below. The Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2013, bear interest semi-annually in cash in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2004. The Senior Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2008 at a designated redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Senior Notes before November 15, 2006 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings. The Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with the Company’s other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The Senior Notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of the Company’s subsidiaries that is a borrower or guarantor under the 2003 Loans. The net proceeds from the offering of the Senior Notes, together with the Company’s cash on hand, were used as follows:

	•		$275.6 million was used to repay the $150 million senior term loan portion and the $50 million subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans, as well as the remaining $66 million of the Company’s $100 million Mezzanine Loan and to pay certain estimated fees and expenses related to the ResortQuest acquisition; and

	•		$79.2 million was placed in escrow pending consummation of the ResortQuest acquisition, at which time that amount will be used, together with available cash, to repay ResortQuest’s senior notes and its credit facility.

Amendment to 2003 Loans
In connection with the offering of the Senior Notes and the ResortQuest acquisition, on November 12, 2003 the Company amended the 2003 Loans to, among other things, permit the ResortQuest acquisition and the issuance of the Senior Notes, maintain the $25.0 million revolving credit facility portion of the 2003 Loans, to repay and eliminate the $150 million senior term loan portion and the $50 million subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans and make certain other amendments to the 2003 Loans.

New Revolving Credit Facility
The Company has received a commitment from certain of its bank lenders under the 2003 Loans to provide a $65.0 million revolving credit facility following the issuance of the Senior Notes and repayment of amounts outstanding under the 2003 Loans (the “New Revolving Credit Facility”). The New Revolving Credit Facility will replace the $25.0 million revolving credit facility portion of the 2003 loans. It is expected that the New Revolving Credit Facility will mature in May 2006 and borrowings thereunder will bear interest at a rate of either LIBOR plus 3.50% or the lending banks’ base rate plus 2.25%. The New Revolving Credit Facility is expected to be guaranteed by the Company’s subsidiaries that are guarantors or borrowers under the 2003 Loans and will be secured by a leasehold mortgage on the Gaylord Palms. The Company anticipates that the New Revolving Credit Facility will require it to achieve substantial completion and initial opening of the Gaylord hotel in Texas by June 30, 2004. Effectiveness of the New Revolving Credit Facility is subject to customary closing conditions, including the negotiation and execution of definitive documentation.

Significant Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of September 30, 2003, including long-term debt and operating lease commitments:

(in thousands)


	Total amounts		Less than						Over
Contractual obligations	committed		1 year		1-2 years		3-4 years		4 years

Long-term debt	$	467,182	$	74,004	$	18,004	$	375,174	$	—
Capital leases		1,127		613		237		252		25
Construction commitments		130,539		115,406		11,483		3,650		—
Arena naming rights		58,950		2,492		5,364		5,913		45,181
Operating leases		701,291		5,056		4,810		7,466		683,959
Other		4,828		322		644		644		3,218

Total contractual obligations	$	1,363,917	$	197,893	$	40,542	$	393,099	$	732,383

The total operating lease amount of $701.3 million above includes the 75-year operating lease agreement the Company entered into during 1999 for 65.3 acres of land located in Osceola County, Florida where Gaylord Palms is located. At the expiration of the secured foreign exchange contract relating to the Viacom Stock owned by the Company which is scheduled for May 2007, the Company will be required to pay the deferred taxes relating thereto. A complete description of the secured foreign exchange contract and this deferred tax liability is contained in Notes 10 and 13 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2003.

ResortQuest Acquisition

Capital Expenditures

The Company currently projects capital expenditures for the twelve months of 2003 to total approximately $230.5 million, which includes continuing construction costs at the new Gaylord hotel in Texas of approximately $207.8 million, approximately $2.0 million related to the possible development of a new Gaylord hotel in Prince George’s County, Maryland and approximately $12.0 million related to Gaylord Opryland. In addition, the Company anticipates approximately $8.6 million of capital expenditures related to the Grand Ole Opry. The Company’s capital expenditures for continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 were $170.3 million.

During the third quarter of 2002, the Company announced that the Gaylord hotel in Texas located Grapevine, Texas near the Dallas/Fort Worth airport, is projected to open in April 2004, two months earlier than previously announced.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS / RISK FACTORS

Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs and expectations of the outcomes of future events that are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, the risks and uncertainties associated with economic conditions affecting the hospitality business generally, the timing of the opening of new hotel facilities, costs associated with developing new hotel facilities, business levels at the Company’s hotels, the impact of the

Securities and Exchange Commission investigation and other costs associated with changes to the Company’s historical financial statements, the ability to successfully complete potential divestitures, the ability of the Company to successfully complete the ResortQuest acquisition and to successfully integrate ResortQuest operations, the ability to consummate the financing for new developments and the other factors set forth under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 18, 2003 and as set forth below. Forward-looking statements include discussions regarding the Company’s operating strategy, strategic plan, hotel development strategy, industry and economic conditions, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, and results of operations. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” and similar expressions. Although the Company believes that the plans, objectives, expectations and prospects reflected in or suggested by its forward-looking statements are reasonable, those statements involve uncertainties and risks, and the Company cannot assure you that its plans, objectives, expectations and prospects will be achieved. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from the results anticipated by the forward-looking statements as a result of many known and unknown factors, including, but not limited to, those contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and elsewhere in this report. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributed to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements contained in this report to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Risk Factor

The Company’s substantial debt, including the Company’s recent 8% Senior Notes due 2013 which closed November 12, 2003, could adversely affect the Company’s cash flow and prevent the Company from fulfilling its obligations under its indebtedness or otherwise have an adverse impact on the business.

As of November 14, 2003, following the consummation of the Company’s $350 million notes offering and the accompanying repayment of the senior and subordinated term loan portion of the 2003 Loans and the Nashville Mezzanine Loan, the total amount of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was approximately $551.7 million. The Company has a significant amount of debt, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. For example, the Company’s indebtedness could:

	•		make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations under the new notes and other indebtedness;

	•		increase the Company’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;

	•		require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to make interest and principal payments on debt, thereby limiting the availability of the Company’s cash flow to fund future capital expenditures, working capital and other general corporate requirements;

	•		limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the hospitality industry, which may place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared with competitors that are less leveraged; and

	•		limit the Company’s ability to borrow additional funds, even when necessary to maintain adequate liquidity.

In addition, the terms of the Company’s Senior Loan, the remaining portions of the 2003 Loans, and the indenture governing the Senior Notes allow the Company, and its New Revolving Credit Facility is expected to allow the Company to incur substantial amounts of additional debt subject to certain limitations. Any such additional debt could increase the risks associated with the Company’s substantial leverage.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following discusses the Company’s exposure to market risk related to changes in stock prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.

Investments

At September 30, 2003, the Company held an investment of 11.0 million shares of Viacom Stock, which was received as the result of the sale of television station KTVT to CBS in 1999 and the subsequent acquisition of CBS by Viacom in 2000. The Company entered into a secured forward exchange contract related to 10.9 million shares of the Viacom Stock in 2000. The secured forward exchange contract protects the Company against decreases in the fair market value of the Viacom Stock, while providing for participation in increases in the fair market value. At September 30, 2003, the fair market value of the Company’s investment in the 11.0 million shares of Viacom Stock was $421.4 million, or $43.66 per share. The secured forward exchange contract protects the Company from market decreases below $56.04 per share, thereby limiting the Company’s market risk exposure related to the Viacom Stock. At per share prices greater than $56.04, the Company retains 100% of the per-share appreciation to a maximum per-share price of $75.66. For per-share appreciation above $75.66, the Company participates in 25.9% of the appreciation.

Interest Rate Swaps

The Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage its exposure to interest rate changes. The swaps involve the exchange of fixed and variable interest rate payments without changing the principal payments. The fair market value of these interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated receipts or payments that would be made to terminate the agreements. The fair market value of the interest rate swap agreements is determined by the lender. Changes in certain market conditions could materially affect the Company’s consolidated financial position.

Derivative Financial Instruments

Subsequent to September 30, 2003, and in conjunction with the Company’s offering of $350 million 8% Senior Notes due 2013, the Company terminated its variable to fixed interest rate swaps with an original notional value of $200 million related to the senior term loan and the subordinated term loan portions of the 2003 Loans which were repaid for a net benefit aggregating approximately $242,000. The Company has also entered into a new interest rate swap with respect to $125 million aggregate principal amount of its $350 million 8% Senior Notes due 2013. This interest rate swap, which has a term of ten years, effectively adjusts the interest rate of that portion of the Senior Notes to LIBOR plus 2.95%. The interest rate swap and the Senior Notes are deemed effective and therefore the hedge is expected to qualify as an effective Fair Value Hedge under SFAS No. 133. If LIBOR was to increase by 100 basis points, the estimated annual impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be approximately $1.3 million.

Outstanding Debt

The Company has exposure to interest rate changes primarily relating to outstanding indebtedness under the 2003 Loans, the Nashville Hotel Loans and potentially, with future financing arrangements including, if obtained, the New Revolving Credit Facility. The Company entered into LIBOR rate swaps at the time it closed the 2003 Loans. The swap currently protects the Company from adverse changes in LIBOR. The terms of the LIBOR swap effectively lock LIBOR at 1.48% for year one and 2.09% for year two. The terms of the Nashville Hotel Loans required the purchase of interest rate hedges in notional amounts equal to the outstanding balances of the Nashville Hotel Loans in order to protect against adverse changes in one-month LIBOR. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company had purchased instruments that cap its exposure to one-month LIBOR at 7.50%. If LIBOR and Eurodollar rates were to increase by 100 basis points each, the estimated impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements would be to reduce net income for the three months ended September 30, 2003 by approximately $0.7 million after taxes based on debt amounts outstanding at September 30, 2003.

Cash Balances

Certain of the Company’s outstanding cash balances are occasionally invested overnight with high credit quality financial institutions. The Company does not have significant exposure to changing interest rates on invested cash at September 30, 2003. As a result, the interest rate market risk implicit in these investments at September 30, 2003, if any, is low.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

Substantially all of the Company’s revenues are realized in U.S. dollars and are from customers in the United States. Although the Company owns certain subsidiaries that conduct business in foreign markets and whose transactions are settled in foreign currencies, these operations are not material to the overall operations of the Company. Therefore, the Company does not believe it has any significant foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company does not hedge against foreign currency exchange rate changes and does not speculate on the future direction of foreign currencies.

Summary

Based upon the Company’s overall market risk exposures at September 30, 2003, the Company believes that the effects of changes in the stock price of its Viacom Stock or interest rates could be material to the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, the Company believes that the effects of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows would not be material.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosures controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is a party to the lawsuit styled Nashville Hockey Club Limited Partnership v. Gaylord Entertainment Company, Case No.
03-1474, now pending in the Chancery Court for Davidson County, Tennessee. In its complaint for breach of contract, Nashville Hockey Club Limited Partnership (“Plaintiff” or the “Limited Partnership”) alleges that the Company failed to honor its payment obligation under a Naming Rights Agreement for the multi-purpose arena in Nashville known as the Gaylord Entertainment Center. Among other things, Plaintiff alleges that the Company failed to make semi-annual payments to Plaintiff in the amount of $1,186,566 when due on January 1, 2003 and in the amount of $1,245,894 when due on July 1, 2003. The Company contends that it made the payments due under the Naming Rights Agreement by way of set off against obligations owed by Plaintiff to CCK Holdings, LLC (“CCK”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, under a “put option” CCK exercised pursuant to the Partnership Agreement between CCK and Plaintiff. CCK has assigned the proceeds of its put option to the Company. Although the Company does not have any obligations to make additional capital contributions to the Limited Partnership under the Partnership Agreement, the Company (along with the other partners in the Limited Partnership) have executed a guarantee of certain of the Limited Partnership’s obligations to the National Hockey League. The Company is vigorously contesting this case by filing an answer and counterclaim denying any liability to Plaintiff, specifically alleging that all payments due to Plaintiff under the Naming Rights Agreement have been paid in full and asserting a counterclaim for amounts owing on the put option under the Partnership Agreement. The Company will continue to vigorously assert its rights in this litigation. Plaintiff has filed a motion for summary judgment, and the parties are proceeding with discovery.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Inapplicable

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Inapplicable

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Inapplicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Inapplicable

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

	(a)		See Index to Exhibits following the Signatures page.

	(b)		Reports on Form 8-K

			(i) A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated July 31, 2003, furnishing a press release under Item 12 announcing financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

			(ii) A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 5, 2003, announcing the Company’s Merger Agreement with ResortQuest International, Inc.

			(iii) A Current Report on Form 8-K, dated September 18, 2003, reissuing the Company’s consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and for each of the three years in the period ended

December 31, 2002 to include the reclassification of the 2002, 2001 and 2000 financial information related to the Company’s radio operations as discontinued operations.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY


Date: November 14, 2003	By:	/s/ Colin V. Reed Colin V. Reed President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


	By:	/s/ David C. Kloeppel David C. Kloeppel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


	By:	/s/ Rod Connor Rod Connor Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, and Assistant Secretary (Principal Accounting Officer)

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 4, 2003, among Gaylord Entertainment Company, GET Merger Sub, Inc. and ResortQuest International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 5, 2003).

2.2		Stock Voting Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2003, by and among ResortQuest International, Inc. and Edward L. Gaylord Revocable Trust, E.K. Gaylord II, Christine Gaylord Everest, Martin C. Dickinson, Michael D. Rose and Colin V. Reed (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 5, 2003).

2.3		Stock Voting Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2003, by and among Gaylord Entertainment Company and Joseph V. Vittoria, James S. Olin, William W. Abbott, Jr., Elan J. Blutinger, Michael P. Castellano, David C. Sullivan and Theodore L. Weise (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to ResortQuest International, Inc.’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 5, 2003).

10.1		Subordinated Loan and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 8, 2003, by and between ResortQuest International, Inc. and the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to ResortQuest’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 10, 2003).

10.2		Guaranty dated as of June 25, 1997, by Craig Leipold, the Company, CCK, Inc. and other Guarantors in favor of the Nashville Hockey League.

31.1		Certification of Colin V. Reed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of David C. Kloeppel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Colin V. Reed and David C. Kloeppel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

EXHIBIT 10.2 GUARANTY This GUARANTY is made as of this 25th day of June, 1997 by Craig Leipold and each of the persons identified on schedule 1 (collectively, the "Guarantors"), each of whom has a direct or indirect interest in Nashville Hockey Club Limited Partnership (the "Expansion Club"), in favor of the National Hockey League, a joint venture organized as a not-for-profit unincorporated association (the "NHL"), and the 26 entities listed on schedule 2 (collectively, the "Grantors"), each of which is a member of the NHL. To induce the Grantors to grant the NHL Rights to the Expansion Club pursuant to the Expansion Agreement dated today among the Grantors, the Expansion Club and the Guarantors (the "Expansion Agreement"), the Guarantors agree as follows: 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings given to them in the Expansion Agreement. 2. Guaranty of Payment and Performance. (a) The Guarantors jointly and severally, for the benefit of the NHL and the Grantors, (i) guarantee the full and punctual payment and performance of all debts, obligations and liabilities of the Expansion Club, whether now or hereafter arising and however incurred, including, but not limited to, all debts, obligations and liabilities of the Expansion Club under the Expansion Agreement (including, but not limited to, any obligation of the Expansion Club to pay liquidated damages under section 7.1 of the Expansion Agreement); and (ii) agree and guarantee to provide to the Expansion Club such amounts as from to time may be necessary for the Expansion Club to (A) maintain a minimum of $5 million of Net Working Capital from and after the Closing Date (or provide the line of credit or letter of credit described in section 5.12(a) of the Expansion Agreement), and (B) otherwise pay all Operating Expenses in the ordinary course and in a timely fashion ((i) and (ii) are collectively referred to herein as the "Guaranteed Obligations"); provided, however, that the aggregate amount of Guaranteed Obligations for which (x) Craig Leipold may be liable under this Guaranty shall not exceed $10 million and (y) the Guarantors listed on schedule 1 may be liable under this Guaranty shall not exceed an aggregate amount of an additional $15 million. The Guarantors described in clause (y) of the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have satisfied their obligations under this Guaranty if at all times they provide to the NHL an irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $15 million, which shall be in form and substance, and from a commercial bank, satisfactory to the Commissioner in his sole discretion, and which shall be drawable by the Grantors and the NHL whenever such Guarantors would have been obligated to make a payment under this Guaranty. (b) This is an absolute, unconditional, irrevocable, unlimited and continuing guaranty of performance and payment (and not only of collection) of the Guaranteed Obligations and shall remain in full force and effect and shall be binding upon the Guarantors so long as there are any Guaranteed Obligations outstanding, regardless of whether there was a period of time when no Guaranteed Obligations were outstanding. The liability of the Guarantors shall be effective immediately and shall be payable on demand by the NHL, acting on its own behalf or as agent for the Grantors. The NHL and the Grantors may obtain recovery from each of the

Guarantors in all cases without first making, pursuing or exhausting any demand, claim or remedy against the Expansion Club, any other Guarantor, or any other person, or against any collateral for the Guaranteed Obligations or any other property. Neither the NHL nor any of the Grantors shall have any duty to collect or protect any collateral or any income thereon, or to preserve any rights against other parties. 3. Guarantors' Agreement to Pay. The Guarantors further agree, jointly and severally, as principal obligors and not as guarantors only, to pay to the NHL on demand, all reasonable costs and expenses (including court costs and legal expenses) incurred or expended by the NHL or the Grantors in connection with the Guaranteed Obligations, this Guaranty or the enforcement thereof, provided that, in the case of an action to enforce this Guaranty, the NHL or the Grantors prevail in such action. 4. Waivers by Guarantors. The Guarantors hereby waive notice of acceptance of this Guaranty, demand of payment, presentment of this or any instrument, notice of dishonor or nonpayment, protest and notice of protest, or other action taken in reliance hereon and all other demands and notices of any description in connection with this Guaranty. The Guarantors further waive all defenses which may be available by virtue of any valuation, stay, moratorium law or other similar law now or hereafter in effect, any right to require the marshalling of assets, and all suretyship defenses generally. The Guarantors hereby waive their right to a jury trial with respect to any action or claim arising out of any dispute in connection with this Guaranty, any rights or obligations hereunder or the performance of such rights and obligations. The Guarantors hereby waive any and all rights of subrogation, reimbursement, or indemnity which may now or hereafter accrue to the Guarantors and any and all rights of recourse to or with respect to any assets or property of the Expansion Club or to any other collateral for the Guaranteed Obligations unless the enforcement of such rights of subrogation, reimbursement or indemnity would not impair the Expansion Club's ability to (a) pay all of its Operating Expenses in the ordinary course and in a timely fashion or (b) satisfy all of its other obligations under the Expansion Agreement and the NHL Rules. 5. Continuity of Guaranteed Obligations; Bankruptcy or Insolvency. If all or any part of any payment applied to any Guaranteed Obligation is or must be recovered, rescinded or returned to a Guarantor for any reason whatsoever (including, without limitation, bankruptcy or insolvency of any party), such Guaranteed Obligation shall be deemed to have continued in existence and this Guaranty shall continue in effect as to such Guaranteed Obligation, all as though such payment had not been made. Upon the bankruptcy, insolvency, or dissolution of, or the commencement of any case or proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, or similar law in respect of, the Expansion Club or any of the undersigned, or upon the default of the Expansion Club or any of the undersigned under the Expansion Agreement, the undersigned will forthwith pay and perform in full all outstanding Guaranteed Obligations, including any that would not otherwise then be due and payable, provided that any such payment is permitted under applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws. 6. NHL's Freedom to Act. This Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect despite, and the liability of the undersigned with respect to any Guaranteed Obligation shall not be terminated by, and each of the undersigned hereby assents to: (a) any amendment or other change in any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations (or any amendment of this Guaranty or the 2

Expansion Agreement as permitted hereunder or thereunder), (b) any extension or postponement of the time of payment of the Guaranteed Obligations, (c) any forbearance, delays, waivers or compromises with respect to any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations, (d) any other indulgence, modification, waiver or amendment of the terms of any agreement relating to any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations, (e) any substitution, exchange or release of any collateral securing any or all of the Guaranteed Obligations, (f) the addition or release of any or all other Guarantors, or (g) any other action or omission whatsoever of any person, all whether with or without any notice to the undersigned (any right to notice or to consent being hereby expressly waived), and any and all of the foregoing shall be binding on the undersigned. 7. Entire Agreement. This Guaranty, together with the Expansion Agreement, sets forth the parties' final and entire agreement with respect to the matters set forth herein and supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings and documents with respect to the subject matter hereof. 8. Cumulative Rights; Breach of Guaranty. The Guarantors further specifically acknowledge, confirm and agree that the obligations contained herein shall be in addition to any and all obligations of the Guarantors and of any entity controlled or affiliated with the Guarantors, and that the rights and remedies of the NHL and the Grantors under and with respect to this Guaranty shall be in addition to any and all rights and remedies the NHL or the Grantors may otherwise have, under the Expansion Agreement, the Writings or applicable law, regardless of whether such obligations and/or rights set forth therein are or may be duplicative of those contained herein, and notwithstanding the presence of any merger or similar clause contained therein. The failure of any of the undersigned to comply with any of the provisions of this Guaranty shall constitute a material breach of this Guaranty and of the Expansion Agreement, which entitles the NHL and the Grantors, in addition to any other rights or remedies they may have, to terminate the Expansion Agreement and to take any action permitted by NHL Rules, including, but not limited to, the right following the Closing Date to commence termination proceedings under Article III of the NHL Constitution. 9. Security; Set-Off. The Guarantors grant to the NHL, for itself and as agent for the Grantors, as security for the full and punctual payment and performance of the Guarantors' obligations hereunder, a continuing lien on and security interest in all sums credited by or due from the NHL in any capacity (including, but not limited to, as agent for any of Guarantors) to the Guarantors, and regardless of the adequacy of any collateral or other means of obtaining repayment of the Guaranteed Obligations, the NHL is hereby authorized at any time and from time to time, without notice to the Guarantors (any such notice being expressly waived by the Guarantors) and to the fullest extent permitted by law, to set off and apply such sums against the obligations of the Guarantors under this Guaranty, whether or not the NHL shall have made any demand under this Guaranty. 10. Notices. All notices and other communications under this Guaranty shall be in writing and, unless otherwise specifically provided herein, shall be deemed given when delivered or transmitted in accordance with the notice provision in Section 14.11 of the Expansion Agreement. 3

11. Amendments. No amendment or waiver of any provision of this Guaranty nor consent to any departure by a Guarantor therefrom shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the NHL, on its own behalf and as agent for the Grantors, and any Guarantor affected thereby. 12. No Waiver. No delay or omission on the NHL's or the Grantors' part in exercising any rights hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such rights or any other rights. No waiver of any right on any one occasion shall result in a waiver of such right on any future occasion or of any other rights; nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right hereunder preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right. 13. Miscellaneous. (a) This Guaranty is one of the "Writings" under the Expansion Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentence, (i) the provisions of section 14.9 of the Expansion Agreement shall apply to any dispute or controversy with respect to this Guaranty; (ii) the Expansion Club may not assign any of its rights or delegate any of its duties under this Guaranty other than in accordance with section 14.12 of the Expansion Agreement and any attempted assignment or delegation in violation of this provision shall be void; and (iii) in addition to their rights and obligations under this Guaranty, the Guarantors shall indemnify the NHL and the Grantors for breach of or misrepresentation in this Guaranty to the extent set forth in section 12.5 of the Expansion Agreement. (b) This Guaranty shall be interpreted and construed, both on its own and in conjunction with the Expansion Agreement, so as to be enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law and to provide the maximum protection possible to the NHL and the Grantors. No rule of construction shall be applied to the interpretation of this Guaranty which could or would result in a construction against the party drafting this document because, in whole or in part, that party so drafted this Guaranty. (c) This Guaranty shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the state of New York without reference to its conflict of laws provisions. (d) The unenforceability of any one clause or provision shall not affect any other provision of this Guaranty. (e) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contain herein, each and every statement, representation, warranty, covenant, agreement and obligation contained herein is intended to be, and is, joint and several as among the undersigned. (f) This Guaranty does not create, and shall not be construed as creating, any rights enforceable by any person other than the NHL and the Grantors. 4

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed and delivered this Guaranty as of the date appearing on page one. /s/ Craig Leipold ---------------------------------- Craig Leipold, individually /s/ Helen Johnson-Leipold ---------------------------------- Helen Johnson-Leipold, individually NEW GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY By: /s/ Terry E. London ---------------------------------- Name: Title: President & Chief Executive Officer CCK, INC. By: /s/ Terry E. London ---------------------------------- Name: Title: President & Chief Executive Officer /s/ Samuel C. Johnson ---------------------------------- Samuel C. Johnson, individually ------------------------------------- , individually ------------------------------------- , individually 5

Schedule 1 Helen Johnson-Leipold New Gaylord Entertainment Company CCK, Inc. Samuel C. Johnson

Schedule 2 BG HOCKEY VENTURES L.P. BOSTON PROFESIONAL HOCKEY ASSOCIATION, INC. CALGARY FLAMES LIMITED PARTENRSHIP CHICAGO BLACKHAWK HOCKEY TEAM, INC. COLORADO AVALANCHE, LLC DALLAS STARS, L.P. DETROIT RED WINGS, INC. DISNEY SPORTS ENTERPRISES, INC. FLORIDA PANTHERS HOCKEY CLUB, LTD. KTR HOCKEY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP LE CLUB DE HOCKEY CANADIEN, INC. LIGHTNING PARTNERS, LTD. LOS ANGELES KINGS HOCKEY CLUB, L.P. MADISON SQUARE GARDEN, L.P. MAPLE LEAF GARDENS, LIMITED MEADOWLANDERS, INC. NEW YORK ISLANDERS HOCKEY CLUB, L.P. NIAGARA FRONTIER HOCKEY, L.P. OTTAWA SENATORS HOCKEY CLUB LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PHILADELPHIA FLYERS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PITTSBURGH HOCKEY ASSOCIATES POCKLINGTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION ST. LOUIS BLUES HOCKEY CLUB, L.P. SAN JOSE SHARKS, L.P. VANCOUVER HOCKEY CLUB LTD. WASHINGTON CAPITALS L.P.

EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS I, Colin V. Reed, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gaylord Entertainment Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 14, 2003 By /s/ Colin V. Reed ------------------------------- Name: Colin V. Reed Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS I, David C. Kloeppel, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gaylord Entertainment Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15 (f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 14, 2003 By /s/ David C. Kloeppel --------------------------------------- Name: David C. Kloeppel Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gaylord Entertainment Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of thE Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. By: /s/ Colin V. Reed ----------------------------------- Colin V. Reed President and Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2003 By: /s/ David C. Kloeppel ----------------------------------- David C. Kloeppel Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2003 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.