A.

A.

To use the Internet, go to www.proxyvote.com to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 11, 2022 (for shares in our 401(k) plan, the voting deadline is 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 10, 2022). Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

To vote by phone, dial 1-800-690-6903 up until 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 11, 2022 (for shares in our 401(k) plan, the voting deadline is 11:59 p.m. eastern time on May 10, 2022). Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

In Person or by Mail. If you hold the shares in your own name, you may also vote in person at the meeting or by signing and dating each proxy card you receive and returning it in the enclosed prepaid envelope. If you vote by proxy, the proxies identified on the back of the proxy card will vote your shares in accordance with your instructions. If you submit a signed proxy card but do not mark the boxes showing

how you wish to vote, the proxies will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.

A.

A.

You and your fellow stockholders will also be asked to transact any other business that may property come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement.

A.

A.

The matters presented in Proposal 1 (Election of Directors) and Proposal 2 (Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation) are not considered routine under the rules of the NYSE. Therefore, brokers, banks or other nominees will not have the ability to vote shares held in street name with respect to those proposals unless the broker, bank or other nominee has received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares held in street name. Broker non-votes will not impact the outcome of Proposals 1 or 2. It is therefore important that you provide instructions to your broker,

bank or other nominee if your shares are held in street name by a broker, bank or other nominee so that you are able to vote with respect to Proposals 1 or 2.

Proposal 3 (Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm) is considered routine and therefore may be voted upon by your broker, bank or other nominee if you do not give instructions for the shares held in street name by your broker, bank or other nominee. If any other matter that properly comes before the meeting is not considered routine under the rules of the NYSE, broker non-votes will not impact the outcome of this matter.

A.

A.

We also may adjourn the meeting if for any reason the Board determines that adjournment is necessary or appropriate to enable our stockholders to (i) consider fully information which the Board determines has not been sufficiently or timely available to stockholders

or (ii) otherwise effectively exercise their voting rights. An adjournment will have no effect on the business that may be conducted at the meeting.

A.

A.

If you hold your shares in “street name” your broker, bank or other nominee will provide you with instructions on how to revoke your proxy.

A.

A.

A.

A.

the meeting, your signed proxy card authorizes Colin V. Reed, Robert Prather and Scott J. Lynn to use their discretion to vote on these other matters.

A.

A nominee will be elected as a director if the number of votes cast “FOR” such nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast “AGAINST” such nominee’s election (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast either for or against such election). Proxies may not be voted for more than ten (10) directors, and stockholders may not cumulate votes in the election of directors. See “Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections” below for the effect of a director nominee failing to receive the required majority vote in an election.

A.

If you abstain from voting on Proposal 2 or Proposal 3, your shares will be counted as present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on such proposal, and thus the abstention will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST such proposal.

A.

A.

Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate qualified, knowledgeable and talented executives who are capable of performing their responsibilities. In 2021 we worked to improve our businesses and our company’s financial condition as we continued our recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. Our efforts included a focus on returning to a positive monthly cash operating balance and, in our hospitality business, a continued strategy of rebooking cancelled group room nights, and booking new group business, for future years.

We continue to focus on our long-term strategic objectives of increasing funds available for distribution to our stockholders and creating long-term stockholder value. You can find more information about our 2021 financial and operating performance, and its impact on our compensation decisions, in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 35.

Proposal 3 asks that our stockholders vote to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the 2022 fiscal year. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment. The Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our and our stockholders’ best interests.

Ernst & Young LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since 2002. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP will be present at the meeting. They will be available to respond to your questions and may make a statement if they desire.

Our business is managed under the direction of our Board of Directors. The Board delegates the conduct of the business to our senior management team. The Board held 8 meetings during 2021. All directors attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and those committees of which the director was a member in the aggregate during 2021.

We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines governing the conduct of our Board. The charters of our Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines, are all posted on our web site at www.rymanhp.com (under “Corporate Governance” on the Investor Relations page).

We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which is applicable to all employees, officers and directors, including the principal executive officer, the principal financial officer and the principal accounting officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our web site at www.rymanhp.com (under “Corporate Governance” on the Investor Relations page). We intend to post amendments to or waivers from our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (to the extent applicable to our directors, principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer) at this location on our website.

We will provide a copy of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our committee charters or our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (and any amendments or waivers) to any stockholder or other person upon receipt of a written request addressed to:

Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc.

Attn: Corporate Secretary

One Gaylord Drive

Nashville, Tennessee 37214

The Board believes that Mr. Reed’s service as both Chairman of the Board and CEO is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. Mr. Reed

possesses a detailed knowledge of our industry as well as an understanding of both the opportunities and challenges we face. The Board thus believes that Mr. Reed is best positioned to develop agendas that ensure that the Board’s time and attention are focused on the most important matters facing the company. The Board also believes that Mr. Reed’s combined role ensures clear accountability, enhances our ability to articulate our strategy and message to our employees, stockholders and business partners and enables decisive overall leadership.

The Board has determined that it is also important to have an Independent Lead Director who will play an active role and oversee many of the functions that an independent chair would otherwise perform. The Board has adopted a description of the duties of the Independent Lead Director, which is posted on our website at www.rymanhp.com (under “Corporate Governance” on the Investor Relations page). Pursuant to this description, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee serves as the company’s Independent Lead Director, and that individual is currently Robert Prather.

Some of the primary functions of the Independent Lead Director are:

Each of our incumbent directors other than Mr. Reed and Mr. Fioravanti is independent, and the Board believes that the independent directors coupled with the Independent Lead Director provide effective oversight of management. Our non-management directors meet regularly in scheduled executive sessions, and the Independent Lead Director presides at these executive sessions. Following an executive session of our non-management directors, the Independent Lead Director acts as a liaison between the non-management directors and the Chairman regarding any specific feedback or issues, provides the Chairman with input regarding agenda items for Board and committee meetings, and coordinates with the Chairman regarding information to be provided to our non-management directors in performing their duties. The Board believes that this approach appropriately and effectively complements the combined CEO/Chairman structure.

Although we believe that the combination of the Chairman and CEO roles is appropriate in the current circumstances, the Board retains the authority to modify our current combined CEO/Chairman structure to best address our circumstances, if and when appropriate.

We strongly encourage each member of the Board to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Due to the pandemic, we conducted the 2021 Annual Meeting in a hybrid manner permitting stockholders to formally attend either in person or virtually in a manner compliant with Delaware law. All of our directors then serving as directors, including Mr. Reed, formally attended the 2021 Annual Meeting, with all but one of our directors attending in person.

As described on page 77, the company plans to host the 2022 Annual Meeting in a “hybrid” format, with attendees expected to be able to formally attend the upcoming Annual Meeting either in person or virtually. The company currently expects all directors to attend the upcoming Annual Meeting in person.

Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board undertook its annual review of director independence in February 2022. Our Board determines the independence of its members through a broad consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances, including an assessment of the materiality of any relationship between the company and a director. In making this assessment, the Board looks not only at relationships from the director’s standpoint, but also from the standpoint of persons or organizations with which the director has an affiliation. In making its determination, the Board adheres to the requirements of, and applies both the objective and subjective standards set forth by, the NYSE (as set forth in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE listed company manual), as well as the requirements and standards of the SEC and other applicable laws and regulations.

During this review, the Board considered whether there are or have been any transactions and relationships between each director, or any member of his or her immediate family, and the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. The Board also examined whether there are or have been any transactions and relationships between the incumbent directors, or their affiliates, and members of the company’s senior management or their affiliates. The purpose of this review was to determine whether any of these relationships or transactions were inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

As part of this review, the Board considered Mr. Roth’s service as a Director Emeritus of the Company from May 2021 to February 2022, performing the duties described below under Director Emeritus Program. Mr. Roth received a total of $55,000 in compensation for his service as a Director Emeritus. The committee determined that the amount of compensation paid to Mr. Roth as a Director Emeritus did not impair Mr. Roth’s independence. Except as set forth above, the Board concluded that no other transactions or relationships involving directors relevant to such independence determination existed.

As a result of this review, the Board affirmatively determined that, with the exception of Colin Reed and Mark Fioravanti, all of our incumbent directors are independent of the company and its management.

The Board maintains 3 standing committees, an Audit Committee, Human Resources Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, to facilitate and assist the Board in the execution of its responsibilities.

The current members of the Audit Committee are Fazal Merchant (Chair), Alvin Bowles, Christian Brickman and Christine Pantoya.

The committee is a separately designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The committee is responsible for, among other things:

The Board has determined that all the members of the committee are financially literate pursuant to the NYSE rules. The Board also has determined that Mr. Merchant and Mr. Brickman are “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning stipulated by the SEC.

In 2021, the committee met 7 times.

The current members of the Human Resources Committee are Patrick Moore (Chair), Robert Prather, Rachna Bhasin and Michael Roth.

The committee is responsible for, among other items:

The committee has also delegated to the CEO the authority to make limited equity grants to new members of our management team to allow such grants to be made in a timely manner, as the committee generally only meets on a quarterly basis. Equity grants under this delegation of authority may only be made as initial equity grants to newly hired executives (other than officers subject to Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) and on the same terms and conditions as were applied by the committee in its most recent prior equity grants. In addition, equity grants under this delegation of authority to any one executive are limited to 6,250 RSUs and must be ratified by the committee.

The committee has engaged Aon as its compensation consultant since 2013. The committee has determined that no conflict of interest exists between Aon and the company (including the company’s Board members and company management) pursuant to Item 407(e)(3)(iv) of SEC Regulation S-K. In 2020 neither Aon nor any affiliate of Aon provided any services to the company or its affiliates apart from its engagement by the committee described above.

Aon assisted the committee in determining if its strategies and plans were advisable based on our current financial position and strategic goals, as well as developments in corporate governance and compensation design. At the committee’s request, Aon also performed several analyses, including updates to the executive salary structure and modeling of executive compensation levels at different levels of company performance, to assist the committee in its review.

For additional information regarding the committee’s processes and procedures for considering and determining executive compensation, including the role of executive officers in determining the amount or form of executive compensation, see Compensation Discussion and Analysis below.

In 2021, the committee met 4 times.

The Human Resources Committee (which functions as our compensation committee) is comprised entirely of independent directors. In addition, there are no relationships among our executive officers, members of the committee or entities whose executives serve on the Board or the committee that require disclosure under applicable regulations of the SEC.

The current members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Robert Prather (Chair), Patrick Moore, Christine Pantoya and Michael Roth.

The committee is responsible for, among other things:

In 2021, the committee met 4 times.

A formal Board evaluation covering Board operations and performance, with a written evaluation from each Board member, is conducted annually by the committee to enhance Board effectiveness. Recommended changes are considered by the full Board. In addition, each Board committee conducts an annual self-evaluation.

The committee annually reviews with the Board the company’s “Statement of Expectations of Directors.” This review includes an assessment of independence, diversity, age, skills, experience and industry backgrounds in the context of the needs of the Board and the company, as well as the ability of current and prospective directors to devote sufficient time to performing their duties in an effective manner. Directors are expected to actively participate in Board discussions and exemplify the highest standards of personal and professional integrity. In particular, the committee seeks directors with established strong professional reputations and expertise in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our businesses.

While our Corporate Governance Guidelines do not prescribe specific diversity criteria for selection of directors, as a matter of practice, the committee considers diversity in the context of the Board as a whole and takes into account diversity, including the personal characteristics (such as gender, ethnicity or age) and experience (such as industry, professional or public service) of current and prospective directors, when selecting new directors to facilitate Board deliberations that reflect a broad range of viewpoints. The committee’s charter gives it responsibility to develop and recommend criteria for the selection of new directors to the Board, including but not limited to diversity, age, skills, experience, time availability and such other criteria as the committee shall determine to be relevant at the time. Currently, the Board has three directors who are racially and ethnically diverse, and two directors who are female.

The committee also considers the impact of any changes in the employment of existing directors. In this regard, if a director changes employment, the director is required to submit a letter of resignation to the

committee. The committee then reviews the director’s change of employment and determines whether the director’s continued service on the Board would be advisable as a result of such change. After completing this evaluation, the committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to whether to accept the director’s resignation, and the Board makes a final determination of whether to accept the director’s resignation.

The committee considers candidates for Board membership recommended by its members and other Board members, as well as by management and stockholders. From time the time the committee may also engage a third party search firm to identify prospective Board members. The committee will only consider stockholder nominees for Board membership submitted in accordance with the procedures set forth in Submitting Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for 2023 Annual Meeting beginning on page 76.

Once the committee has identified a prospective nominee, the committee makes an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination is based on whatever information is provided to the committee with the recommendation of the prospective candidate, as well as the committee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others. The preliminary determination is based primarily on the need for additional Board members to fill vacancies or expand the size of the Board and the likelihood that the prospective nominee can satisfy the evaluation factors described below. If the committee determines, in consultation with the Chairman of the Board and other Board members as appropriate, that additional consideration is warranted, it may request additional information about the prospective nominee’s background and experience. The committee then evaluates the prospective nominee against the following standards and qualifications:

The committee also considers such other relevant factors as it deems appropriate, including the current composition of the Board and the evaluations of other prospective nominees. In connection with this evaluation, the committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee, and if warranted, one or more members of the committee, and others as appropriate, will interview the prospective nominee in person or by telephone. After completing this evaluation and interview, the committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to whether this prospective nominee and any other prospective nominees should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the committee.

Mr. Roth was initially identified to the committee as a potential director nominee by an existing director, Mr. Reed. After a review of the qualifications, expertise and experience of Mr. Roth, including his past service on the Board and his service as a Director Emeritus, the committee ultimately recommended to the full Board that Mr. Roth become a nominee for director.

New directors participate in an orientation program that includes discussions with senior management, their review of background materials on our strategic plan, organization and financial statements and visits to our facilities. We encourage each director to participate in continuing educational programs that are important to maintaining a director’s level of expertise to perform his or her responsibilities as a Board member.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Bylaws provide for a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections. Under these provisions, any director nominee in an uncontested election will be elected to the Board if the votes cast for such nominee’s election exceed the votes cast against such nominee’s election

at any meeting for the election of directors at which a quorum is present (with abstentions and broker non-votes not counted as votes cast either for or against such election). In addition, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, each director agrees, by serving as a director or by accepting nomination for election as a director, that if while serving as a director he or she fails to receive the required majority vote in a director election, he or she will tender his or her resignation as a director for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, ultimately, the Board, as described below.

In the event any incumbent director nominee does not receive the requisite majority vote, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the circumstances of the failed election and will make a recommendation regarding the director’s resignation to the full Board and will evaluate the resignation in light of the best interests of the company and its stockholders in determining whether to recommend accepting or rejecting the tendered resignation, or whether other action should be taken. Thereafter, the Board will act upon the resignation, taking into account the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and will publicly disclose (by a press release, a filing with the SEC or other broadly disseminated means of communication) its decision regarding the tendered resignation and the rationale behind the decision within 90 days of the certification of the election results. In such event, if the Board accepts the resignation, the nominee will no longer serve on the Board, and if the Board rejects the resignation, the nominee will continue to serve until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier disqualification, death, resignation or removal.

The Board of Directors does not believe in imposing term limits or a mandatory retirement age as such policies may result in the loss of experienced directors who have developed expertise and insights into the Company’s business, strategy and industry. The Board recognizes the importance of an appropriate balance of experience and fresh perspectives and considers the overall mix of age and tenure on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates, at least annually, the Board’s composition to ensure that the Board maintains complementary and

diverse skill sets, perspectives, backgrounds and experiences for its continued effectiveness.

The Board intends to maintain an orderly turnover of members of the Board over time, with the goal of having a mix of years of tenure of Board members between those who have served longer term, medium term, or shorter term.

Our Board has created a Director Emeritus program to avail itself of the counsel of retiring directors who have made and can continue to make a unique contribution to the deliberations of the Board. Under the program, the Board may, at its discretion, designate a retiring director as Director Emeritus for one or more one-year terms following the director’s retirement. A Director Emeritus may provide advisory services as requested from time to time and may be invited to attend meetings of the Board, but may not vote, be counted for quorum purposes or have any of the duties or obligations imposed on our directors or officers under applicable law or otherwise be considered a director.

The Board appointed Michael Roth as a Director Emeritus for an initial one-year term following Mr. Roth’s retirement as a director, effective as of the 2021 Annual Meeting. Upon Mr. Roth’s re-appointment to the Board on February 24, 2022, he resigned as a Director Emeritus. We do not anticipate utilizing the Director Emeritus program during 2022.

The Dodd-Frank Act requires that we disclose the ratio of CEO pay in 2021 to the median employee pay of all our employees, other than the CEO, calculated in accordance with Item 402(u) of SEC Regulation S-K. In making this calculation, we first identified the company’s median employee by examining the 2021 total cash compensation for all individuals, excluding our CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2021, the last day of our payroll year.

We included all employees, whether employed on a full-time, part-time or seasonal basis (for purposes of this calculation, a total of 1,048 employees). We did not make any assumptions, adjustments or estimates with respect to total cash compensation, except that we annualized the compensation for all full- and part-time employees who were not employed by us for all of

2021. We selected total cash compensation for all employees as our compensation measure because we do not widely distribute annual equity awards to employees. We then identified the company’s median employee based on total cash compensation, and we determined that such median employee served as a warehouse associate in our Entertainment business segment and averaged an approximately 39-hour work week during 2021.

As required by SEC rules, for purposes of calculating the pay ratio, pay for the median employee and for our CEO were determined using the methodology set forth in our 2021 Summary Compensation Table on page 55 below. Using this methodology, we determined that a reasonable estimate of the 2021 total compensation of our median employee was $28,191 and that the total compensation of our CEO was $11,176,606.

In addition to the pay ratio disclosure required by the Dodd-Frank Act, we believe that it is also important to take into consideration:

We continue to believe that it is appropriate to provide two additional supplemental calculations that reflect the pay ratio of the total compensation of our CEO to (1) the total compensation of the median of all full-time employees, and (2) the total compensation of the median of the full-time employees of our REIT entity (comprising our Hospitality business segment).

Accordingly, we determined that the following were reasonable estimates of the pay ratio required to be disclosed by Item 402(a) of SEC Regulation S-K, as well as the supplemental pay ratios described above:

In designing our CEO’s compensation in 2021, our Human Resources Committee was mindful of the need to provide a market-competitive compensation package with a significant element of equity-based and performance-based compensation (not generally available to our employee base), which the committee believes is in the best interests of the company and its stockholders. Additionally, the committee monitors management’s determination of compensation at all levels of the company (including through pay surveys and other market assessments), based on each employee’s position, skill level and experience, and the committee believes that our compensation practices as a whole are fair and competitive with others in the marketplace.

In 2015 the SEC issued proposed rules regarding the adoption of “clawback” policies by publicly listed companies in accordance with the requirements of Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”). When final SEC rules implementing these requirements have become effective, publicly listed companies will be required to adopt a “clawback” policy providing for the recovery of certain incentive-based compensation from the executive officers of the company in the event the company is required to restate its financials as a result of material noncompliance of the company with any financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.

In order to ensure full compliance with these SEC rules, we intend to adopt our own formal clawback policy applicable to our executive officers complying with such rules once these final rules have been adopted by the SEC. In addition, Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires the recovery of incentive awards in certain circumstances. If we are required to restate our financials due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of

misconduct, our CEO and CFO will be required under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to reimburse us for (1) any bonus or other incentive- or equity-based compensation received during the 12 months following the first public issuance of the non-complying document, and (2) any profits realized from the sale of our securities during such 12 month period. Our omnibus incentive plan also provides that any award made to a participant under the plan will be subject to mandatory repayment by the participant to us to the extent required by (a) any award agreement, (b) any “clawback” or recoupment policy adopted by the company to comply with the requirements of any applicable laws, rules or regulations, including final SEC rules adopted pursuant to Section 954 of the Dodd-Frank Act, or otherwise, or (c) any applicable laws which impose mandatory recoupment, under circumstances set forth in such applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

The Board as a whole has responsibility for oversight of the company’s enterprise risk management function, with reviews of certain areas being conducted by the relevant Board committees that report on their deliberations to the Board. The oversight responsibility of the Board and its committees is made possible by a management report process that is designed to provide both visibility and transparency to the Board about the identification, assessment and management of critical risks and management’s risk mitigation strategies. In this regard, each committee meets in executive session with key management personnel and representatives of outside advisors (for example, our director of internal audit meets in executive session with the Audit Committee). The areas of focus of the Board and its committees include competitive, economic, operational, financial (accounting, credit, liquidity and tax), legal, compliance, information technology security programs (including cybersecurity), ESG/corporate social responsibility, political and reputational risks.

The Board and its committees oversee risks associated with their respective principal areas of focus, as outlined below:

We believe that the Board’s role in risk oversight is facilitated by the leadership structure of the Board. In this regard, we believe that, by combining the positions of Chairman of the Board and CEO, the Board gains a valuable perspective that combines the operational experience of a member of management with the oversight focus of a member of the Board. We also believe that the division of risk management-related roles among the company’s full Board, Audit Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Human Resource Committee as noted above fosters an atmosphere of significant involvement in the oversight of risk at the Board level and complements our risk management policies.

The Board, in executive sessions of non-management directors (which are presided over by the company’s Independent Lead Director), also considers and discusses risk-related matters. This provides a forum for risk-related matters to be discussed without

management or the Chairman of the Board and CEO present. The company’s Independent Lead Director acts as a liaison between the company’s Chairman of the Board and CEO and the company’s independent directors to the extent that any risk-related matters discussed at these executive sessions require additional feedback or action.

In setting compensation, the Human Resources Committee also considers the risks to our stockholders that may be inherent in our compensation programs. We believe that our compensation programs are appropriately structured and provide for a suitable balance between long-term and short-term compensation and have an appropriate performance-based and “at risk” component. We also believe that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.

Given the importance of information security to our company, the Audit Committee receives regular reports from our chief financial officer, our chief information officer and our vice-president of internal audit regarding our program for managing our information security risks, including data privacy and protection risks faced by the company. Our information security risk mitigation efforts, which are overseen by the Audit Committee, include a regular information security training program for employees, the introduction of information security concepts as part of our new employee onboarding process and regular third party assessments of our information security program. We also maintain an insurance policy that provides coverage for security breaches.

We have created an ESG program, as we believe such a program is an integral part of our operating strategy. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board oversees our ESG program efforts. We also have a management-level ESG steering committee, which supports our commitment to ESG and other public policy matters.

The pillars of our ESG program are as follows:

We also believe it is important to address climate and resource issues by measuring our progress in improving the environmental footprint of our hotel properties. Specifically, we are working with Marriott, the operator of our hotel properties, to establish baselines for our energy, water and waste usage for our hotel portfolio. We also continue to work with Marriott to implement new, and to expand existing, programs at our hotels to minimize risk and enhance value.

We are committed to equal employment opportunity (EEO), and it is our policy to provide EEO to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex (i.e., pregnancy,

gender identity, or sexual orientation), national origin, age, mental and/or physical disability, genetic information or military status.

We have recently enhanced our recruitment initiatives to attract, employ and develop more minority candidates. In 2021, these efforts included establishing relationships with diverse Nashville-area community groups in preparation for future open positions and developing a protocol to ensure a diverse candidate pool is identified and interviewed for all senior open positions, director-level and above. We have also increased our presence and partnerships with local schools and universities to hire more diverse graduates at our venues and engage these graduates in career development programs.

In 2021 we launched a management development and mentoring program for high-potential employees, with an emphasis on diverse participants. In addition, we intend to promote our diversity, equity and inclusion mission more prominently across our career platforms.

We have provided more information about our workforce in our 2020 ESG report, described below.

For more information about our ESG program, including our 2020 ESG report, which provides a detailed overview of our ESG efforts and progress, and our ESG steering committee charter, please visit our website at:

https://rymanhospitalitypropertiesinc.gcs-

web.com/sustainability

Please note that our website is provided as an inactive textual reference and the information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

We expect to publish our 2021 ESG report, providing an update on our ESG efforts and progress to date, in the third quarter of 2022.

Our insider trading policy restricts our executive officers and directors from engaging in any transactions designed to hedge or otherwise offset any decrease in the fair market value of our equity securities. Our insider trading policy also prohibits executive officers and directors from pledging or otherwise encumbering

a significant amount of equity securities (generally defined as the lesser of 0.50% of our outstanding equity securities or 10% of the equity securities owned by the individual) without prior approval of the Human Resources Committee.

We will bear the cost of soliciting proxies for the 2022 Annual Meeting. We have retained Morrow Sodali LLC to assist in the solicitation and will pay them approximately $6,000. Our officers may also solicit proxies by mail, telephone, e-mail or facsimile transmission, but we will not reimburse them for their efforts. Upon request, we will reimburse brokers, dealers, banks and trustees, or their nominees, for reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials.

We believe that our relationship with our stockholders is an important part of our corporate governance program. Our stockholder and investor outreach generally includes investor road shows, analyst meetings, investor days and investor conferences and meetings. We also communicate with our stockholders through our SEC filings (including our annual report and proxy statement), press releases and our website. In addition, our conference calls for quarterly earnings releases are available to anyone in real time and on an archived basis. During 2021 we also reached out to 37 of our 40 largest stockholders who have a policy of engaging with portfolio companies, representing approximately 74% of our outstanding shares, to engage in a dialogue regarding their areas of focus and concern.

The primary corporate governance issues raised by our stockholders during 2021 were as follows:

Continued Focus on Executive Compensation. Several investors continued to ask that we provide expanded disclosure with respect to the rationale for our compensation decisions in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, including with respect to cash bonus awards made to our CEO and our NEOs to the extent such awards are not paid based on our achievement of designated goals pursuant to the terms of our annual short-term incentive compensation plan. Taking this

feedback into account, we have included additional information about this topic for 2021 in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 35.

Continued Focus on ESG Efforts, Including Additional Information on our Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Efforts. Several investors continue to ask that we provide an enhanced level of reporting regarding our ESG policies and procedures, as well as additional information regarding our diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. We incorporated this feedback into our 2020 ESG report, which we published in the third quarter of 2021, and we intend to expand this reporting in future ESG reports.

Stockholders, employees and others interested in communicating with the Board (including non-management directors) may write to Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, One Gaylord Drive, Nashville, Tennessee 37214. The Corporate Secretary reviews all such correspondence and regularly forwards to the Board a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all correspondence that, in the opinion of our Corporate Secretary, deals with the functions of the Board or committees thereof or that he otherwise determines requires their attention. Directors may review a log of all correspondence addressed to members of the Board and request copies of any such correspondence.

Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are immediately brought to the attention of our internal audit department and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee with respect to such matters. In addition, stockholders, employees and other interested parties may communicate directly with our Independent Lead Director, individual independent directors or the independent directors as a group by email at boardofdirectors@rymanhp.com

BlackRock, Inc., which has sole voting power with respect to 4,536,824 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 4,864,221 shares. The address for the reporting person is 55 East 52^nd Street, New York, New York 1005.

Our executive compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate qualified, knowledgeable and talented executives who are capable of performing their responsibilities. In designing our executive compensation programs, our goals are to ensure that:

Our corporate objectives are to continue to increase funds available for distribution to our stockholders and to create long-term stockholder value. Consistent with these goals and objectives, the Human Resources Committee, which acts as our compensation

committee, has developed and approved an executive compensation program providing for a range of compensation levels for our NEOs with the intent of rewarding strong performance and reducing compensation when our performance objectives are not achieved.

For purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, our NEOs are:

As described below, effective as of March 1, 2022, Mr. Fioravanti continued as our President, with increased responsibility for oversight of our business, including direct supervision of our Entertainment business segment, and Ms. Hutcheson became our Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer).

Our Human Resources Committee (which functions as our compensation committee) annually reviews our executive compensation program to determine how well actual compensation targets and levels meet our overall compensation philosophy and to compare our compensation programs to our peers. The committee also oversees our compensation programs.

For 2021, the committee used a compensation peer group of the following 13 companies:

The committee believes, based on Aon’s recommendation, that these companies are the most relevant peer group against which to review compensation for our NEOs, as such companies are all REITs with a focus on lodging, apartments or other real estate investments and have an implied market capitalization and/or total enterprise value within a range similar to the company. This peer group had total enterprise values ranging from approximately $1.4 billion to $31.8 billion as of December 31, 2021, compared to the company’s total enterprise value of approximately $8.0 billion as of December 31, 2021. The peer group selection criteria used by the committee, and the peer group actually selected by the committee, were unchanged from 2020.

The committee annually determines whether our overall executive compensation program is consistent with our business strategy and promotes our compensation philosophy. In determining target total annual compensation for each NEO, the committee relies on its general experience and subjective considerations of various factors, including our strategic business goals, information with respect to the peer group set forth above, proprietary and publicly available compensation surveys and data with respect to REITs and other public companies provided by Aon, and each executive

officer’s position, experience, level of responsibility, individual job performance, contributions to our corporate performance, job tenure and future potential.

The committee does not set specific targets or utilize any formulaic benchmarks for overall compensation or for allocations between fixed and performance-based compensation, cash and non-cash compensation or short-term and long-term compensation. In addition, the committee uses proprietary and publicly available compensation surveys and data with respect to REITs and other public companies provided by our compensation consultant, Aon, to obtain a general understanding of current compensation practices, including to confirm that the base salary and other elements of target total compensation opportunity for our executive officers is at a market-competitive level.

The committee does not specifically target or benchmark in any formulaic manner any element of compensation or the total compensation payable to NEOs based on these factors.

Base salary is designed to compensate our NEOs for their roles and responsibilities and to provide a secure level of guaranteed cash compensation. We have employment agreements with Mr. Reed and Mr. Fioravanti that provide for a minimum base salary. We have severance agreements with Mr. Chaffin, Mr. Lynn and Ms. Hutcheson that do not provide for any minimum base salary.

Each NEO’s base salary was set based on:

In 2021, base salary represented 11.5% of our CEO’s total compensation package and (on average) 22% of our other NEOs’ total compensation package (calculated in the manner described on page 39). The committee annually reviews the base salaries of each NEO and may make adjustments based on individual performance and changes in roles and responsibilities.

At its February 25, 2021 meeting, the committee reviewed the existing base salaries and perquisites for our NEOs. Specifically, the committee considered each NEO’s current base pay, taking into account base salary levels paid to persons holding similar positions at

peer companies, as well as the previous adjustments made to each NEO’s base salary in 2020 prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The committee also noted the continuing challenging conditions and uncertainties facing the company in 2021 due to the reduced business levels associated with the pandemic.

Based on its review of the factors described above, the committee determined that the base salary amounts for the NEOs should remain unchanged from 2020 levels, provided that if at any time during the year the company elected to grant a merit increase to director-level and above employees of the company the NEOs were eligible to participate in such increase. Effective as of June 2021, based on improved financial performance from 2020, the company implemented a 3% merit increase for all director-level and above employees, and salaries for all NEOs (other than Mr. Reed, who declined to accept such increase) were increased by such percentage, as set forth below: